eurogamer.net

NoneYa, do games w Nintendo emulator Pizza Emulators pulls its apps from Google Play store

Exactly what Nintendo was hoping for. I can’t blame the developers, though. But this sucks.

Old ass game systems where it’s practically impossible or expensive to get the physical games anymore, let alone the console, with some titles locked to those systems, never to be enjoyed again except through emulation.

mesamunefire,

Yep. If anyone is using emulators, I would suggest keeping a copy just in case this spills over to all emulators.

CileTheSane,
@CileTheSane@lemmy.ca avatar

Old ass game systems where it’s practically impossible or expensive to get the physical games anymore, let alone the console, with some titles locked to those systems

And if you do manage to acquire a physical copy Nintendo isn’t go to see any of the money you spent on it anyway

IdiosyncraticIdiot, do gaming w With gaming's internet usage climbing, how do internet providers keep up?

Alt title: ISPs attempt to avoid infrastructure upgrades unless paid for by others; points fingers.

Nothing new tbh.

NoneYa, do gaming w Borderlands is failing already.

Duh.

It’s the classic thing that happens to all these movies and TV shows that are written by people who purposely avoid the source material and brag about “we didn’t play the game or read the books” like that somehow is going to make the content better?

jqubed,
@jqubed@lemmy.world avatar

Offhand I can only think of one movie (and sequels) where “didn’t read the book” made the movie significantly better: The Bourne Identity. Those books really were awful!

Bbbbbbbbbbb,

The Witcher video games are better than the source and the original author is seething from its success

magiccupcake,

I mean the books are great too, apparently they’re even better in it’s native language.

Klear,

The games are great because CD Project are massive fans who read the books many times, so that hardly fits.

theatomictruth,

I thought the 1993 Mario movie was pretty fun

visor841,

I think there’s a difference when the source material isn’t great. IIRC Forest Gump is another example.

PoopingCough,

Also Starship Troopers

yamanii,
@yamanii@lemmy.world avatar

I thought that was debunked?

PoopingCough,

I’m not sure how you think this video is related to the comment I replied to ?

Klear,

There’s also Adaptation, technically.

thefartographer,

“I hate that thing that you love, so I convinced someone to pay me a million dollars to shit on it for you. Now pay me for my failures!

Wistful,
@Wistful@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Looking at Witcher TV series

mnemonicmonkeys,

Not only that, they probably would have been better off not using the original 4 playable characters since every game comes with a new set. Just make sure the side characters are done well and you keep the same feel as the games and it should have been an easy win

tb_,
@tb_@lemmy.world avatar

I think the Halo show could’ve been much more interesting too if they focused on someone not the main character of the games.

But no, gotta keep the most recognizable character

ryathal,

Only if they read anything about the games or books. Leaving master chief out doesn’t fix the active contempt for the source material.

restingboredface,

I would have fully supported a movie with Mister Torgue running around having adventures. Of course he would be played by John Cena in a mullet.

nanoUFO, do games w Peter Molyneux says he regrets over-promising his games
@nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works avatar
echo64, do games w SAG-AFTRA votes unanimously to expand its strike to include the games industry

Nice nice, worker rights and less AI in video games. Win win.

Foggyfroggy,

Workers rights absolutely. Pay your human workers even while using ai to make a great product. AI didn’t do anything to me, it’s how the companies decide to use it.

echo64,

Oh yeah I’m sure they will use the ai to pay human workers as well. You definitely know that if they are allowed to use ai they won’t use it in a way that means they can stop paying humans and can just have ais generate everything all whist delivering a lower quality product to the customer.

It’s a win win, as long as you are an executive or a shareholder.

MossyFeathers,
@MossyFeathers@pawb.social avatar

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • Katana314,

    It won’t lift up everyone, but the people that it will help are in any normal classification considered workers.

    stupidfly,

    I don’t know… this is a development industry. I think this will just accelerate the move to AI.

    EtherealMoon,
    @EtherealMoon@lemmy.world avatar

    I am potentially okay with this. The entertainment industry has been creatively bankrupt for too long. Actors will move to more independent work, more interesting and experimental content will get made, corporate will advance AI technology. Win-win?

    DLSchichtl,

    “Actors will move to more independent work still have to make a living wage and thus do whatever pays.”

    FYFY

    Pixlbabble, (edited )

    Or more Ai as a cash incentive. It’s already an industry that creates npc’s, Ai will improve this, Indy’s might just sit there and craft perfect Ai actors and license them out.

    echo64,

    Hey voice actors, take this five bucks today so we can make your job vanish tomorrow, it’s a win win! For us. Not you. This guy thinks you should do it though because we already… make npcs? That you currently voice.

    Pixlbabble,

    I just think it’s inevitable that we will see fully voiced and interactive ai npc companions. I’m not saying it’s good or bad, I’m in a union and I’m pro worker but this is tech and I think tech is gonna tech.

    echo64,

    It’s inevitable if you give up and let companies do whatever they want yes. It’s not if you get them to sign papers and lobby for regulation to protect workers.

    I don’t understand this defeatist mentality at all sorry.

    Nilz, do games w Ubisoft announces studio closure as it lays off 185 staff

    “review and pursue various transformational strategic and capitalistic options to extract the best value for stakeholders”.

    Ah there it is. That’s the only thing that matters anyway.

    9bananas,

    fyi, in case someone isn’t clear on the difference:

    stakeholder ≠ shareholder

    stakeholders are basically all people involved, including staff, and even stuff like landlords, janitors, citizens (sometimes things like parents), etc.

    it’s anyone with a stake in an organizations operations!

    example: a city decides to create a new bus route. in this case, stakeholders include the local residents, the companies involved in creating the route, the companies supplying the buses, the mechanics needed to keep the fleet running, etc., etc.

    there’s a usually a LOT of stakeholders, and typically you don’t always include everyone in every little decision because it quickly becomes unmanageable. so only the most relevant ones are included in most decisions, and who exactly that is depends on the project.

    shareholders on the other hand are what everyone is probably thinking of, and that’s the people (“people” being used generously here) only interested in next quarters profits. you know! the parasites!

    of course the message is still bullshit and nothing but coded corpo-speech for “shareholders”, but i thought some folks might be interested in knowing the difference anyhow.

    even if, in this case, it’s only important to highlight the extra special bullshit they put into the statement…

    Nilz,

    Good point and thanks for pointing it out, I misread it. A shareholder and stakeholder aren’t (necessarily) the same indeed.

    9bananas,

    actually good point on your part too, cause i should have mentioned that as well:

    shareholders can also be stakeholders!

    totally not confusing or anything…

    i really hate basically all the language around finance…

    xkforce, (edited ) do gaming w Twitch "isn't profitable" admits CEO, in wake of recent layoffs

    If you are bad at your job, you lose your job. If the CEO is bad at their job, you lose your job. If the CEO is REALLY bad at their job, they get a golden parachute.

    hayes_, do gaming w Unity bosses sold stock days before controversial repricing announcement

    These stories are so dumb/intentionally misleading/outrage bait.

    Executives have predefined stock sale schedules at regular intervals. This allows them to convert their equity to cash and avoid conflicts of interest. That is, it’s hard to gain an advantage over the market when you sell exactly the same amount every month for the next 4 years.

    Where was everyone’s outrage the other 99% of times this guy sold exactly the same amount of stock?

    CluelessLemmyng,

    So they could just time the announcements after their scheduled sell-off?

    s20,

    Seems like if they wanted to avoid this sort of suspicion, they’d time the announcement for either right before or nowhere near when the scheduled sale would take place.

    But then they wouldn’t get to feel like a Bond villain, so…

    hayes_,

    The point is this is one sale of many.

    Yes, hypothetically the CEO could influence the date an announcement is made for their own personal gain, but it’s not worth it and there will be many more sell events in the future.

    Long run, trying to scheme an announcement to gain more at 1/100 sales isn’t worth it.

    CEO John Riccitiello shifted 2000 shares last week on 6th September, … part of a trend over the past year where the exec has sold more than 50,000 shares in total and bought none.

    This is a drop in his equity bucket and any gains this article implies are due to “insider trading” will disappear in subsequent events.

    the_gmg, do games w Unity bosses sold stock days before development fees announcement, raising eyebrows

    Selling 2000 shares while retaining over 3000000 shares seems to indicate that this is for quarterly tax payments, which are due this week.

    I’m not defending any actions of Unity.

    The author / headline writer are being disingenuous or just clickbait chasing.

    EnderofGames,

    The information in the article is from here:

    Having the scumbag of a CEO in the headline may have been a mistake. Riccitiello sold the least shares in the recent transaction history of the company. Also, I don’t know where you get your "retaining over 3000000 shares’ from. The source says Riccitiello sold all his shares in his possession.

    The article mentions two others:

    Tomer Bar-Zeev who sold 37.5k shares on 1st September, for around $1.4m. Shlomo Dovrat, meanwhile, sold 68k shares on 30th August for around $2.5m.

    Bar-Zeev sold 37500 shares of ~1300000 owned on automated sell. That’s a factor of ten and a fair bit away from 2k sold from 3 mil, but that might be normal. It was automated, after all.

    Dovrat’s transaction is mostly the same, roughly double the shares sold and roughly double the shares owned. However, it was not automated.

    I believe the article mentioned them because they sold the most, but they clearly weren’t taking the amount retained into account. The third most sold, however, by Robynne Sisco was a sell of 25768, retaining 14700 (sold ~64%).

    There are a fair number of other sells, but if the Bar-Zeev and Dovrat sells don’t look suspicious, nothing else will stand out.

    What does seem a little odd- and I have no idea if this is at all unusual- is that in the last twelve months, more shares have been bought than sold (net shares almost 10,000,000), and in the last 3 months more shares have been sold than bought (net shares almost 3,500,000). In the last 3 months, the number of insider traders is a little over 1/3 of the amount of insider trades over the last 12 months (under the assumption it should be about 1/4). All of the insider buys seem to be the options granted for working for Unity. I assume it isn’t too odd for the board of directors to sell and never buy, but they have increased selling a fair bit in the last 3 months, and it seems specifically the last two weeks.

    the_gmg,

    It is right in the SEC filling which anyone can look up. The 2000 shares sold were by the CEOs wife, which is why they are marked as indirect.

    $80k is rich people walking around money when compared to ~$100 million. It was part of an automated selling plan and not suspicious in any way.

    There’s an old Peter Lynch quote about many reasons to sell but only one to buy.

    EnderofGames,

    More confusing accounting that I’ve never learned, and probably never will.

    At first I thought it was because of direct/indirect ownership. But what is the point of “5. Amount of Securities Beneficially Owned Following Reported Transaction(s) (Instr. 3 and 4)” being 3mil with no transaction, but the 2000 stock transaction showing they owned none? I see nothing on the form or in the definition showing that direct or indirect ownership show be reported differently. They are all owned by the ‘reporting person’. But clearly this is all me just not being able to read how they filled it out.

    I agree $80k is nothing to $100mil, I do believe that if they have 3mil of securities, then it doesn’t matter, no matter how high or low the securities are worth. I disagree with the idea that automation makes it not suspicious, though. If the stocks were all automatically sold off, then the company devalues itself afterwards, it has the same intent and outcome as any other insider trading.

    the_gmg,

    Ok, so the report is on the person (CEO in this case). Only directors and certain executive levels are required to report.

    Table I shows ‘non-derivative securities’ (regular stock). The CEO holds in their own name 3 million+ shares. No transaction was reported for those, but they have to be listed.

    The CEO’s spouse aquired 2000 shares at a cost of $1.425 each. After this transaction, they had 2000 shares total (column 5).

    They then sold those shares for $40 each. After, they weren’t holding any stock, so column 5 shows 0.

    The CEO financially benefits from this, so the transactions are listed on their form, as (I) for indirect. If the spouse also had a position within Unity which required reporting this would be listed on their own SEC form as well.

    Madbrad200, do games w Baldur's Gate 3's companions were overly horny due to a bug

    I had a convo with gale at the celebration post goblin camp and he was all about inviting me to see some magic trick and I was like cool, sure why not

    then I speak to asterion and he’s like “so your’e gonna fuck gale huh? Good on ya man”

    I was like, what?

    the romance in this game is definitely forced and overly aggressive

    FracturedEel,

    Yeah I just had a scene where wyll asked me to dance and I was ready to dunk on him with my skillz but instead they danced and make out and the game didn’t even ask me if I wanted to

    bane_killgrind,

    You might have missed a lot of signals over the years if you didn't grok that his hips weren't lying.

    BrandoGil,

    Yeah, but that doesn’t mean I wanted to be water brothers with him!

    bane_killgrind,
    BrandoGil,
    bane_killgrind,

    HAHA gross but I love all the John Carter stories, I'm going to read that book for the different take on mars.

    BrandoGil,

    It’s SO good

    ______, (edited )

    This is the classic mass effect dialogue option meme where you pick a mellow option and then the MC lashes out.

    A: “No.” B: “that’s a great idea”

    You pick a. Then: “Why would you ever suggest that idea, that’s horrible, I want you out of my group!”

    p03locke,
    @p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar
    JonEFive,

    One of my favorite youtube channels did a riff on this

    RiikkaTheIcePrincess,
    @RiikkaTheIcePrincess@kbin.social avatar

    Okay I just spent a while watching some of their videos <.<; Thanks(?) for sharing... I think... 🤔

    RiikkaTheIcePrincess,
    @RiikkaTheIcePrincess@kbin.social avatar

    Ugh, I hate bad PC writing. It's bad enough when it's "I agree 100%," "I agree 100% and wanna s your d," and "You're the stupidest, ugliest, evilest piece of absolute crap I have ever seen in my life and I'd kill you myself if it wouldn't get your blood in the carpet" but then some games just insist on somehow making it non-obvious which is which >:|

    correcthorsedickbatterystaple,

    "hi lae'zel we just met --"

    "i want your moisture"

    ohhhhkay

    Cypher,

    I literally took all the options that piss her off short of killing her and she still tried coming onto my PC.

    I really hope that has been fixed.

    JonEFive,

    I mean, being a combative dick to her is pretty much her aphrodisiac.

    pory,
    @pory@lemmy.world avatar

    Any other character I’d agree with you, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Lae’zel is into that.

    SpiderShoeCult,

    Yup, sounds pretty much in character.

    :::spoiler Spoiler

    I mean she literally has you fight her as a romantic encounter, initiative roll and all. :::

    Maolmi,
    @Maolmi@feddit.de avatar

    Bae’zel fucking me after I slaughtered the whole goblin camp was totally ok for her character.

    Trystan,

    The article said it was a bug remember

    Chev,

    I never went to camp when they invited me to the party and the next time I saw everybody was in act 2. Did I miss a lot?

    Madbrad200,

    Kind of sorta not really?

    It’s a fun wrap-up to act 1 before you dive into the underdark or the mountain pass. It also serves as an important relationship set-up - it’s where you’re meant to establish who you want to romance, if anyone.

    But it’s probably not required so

    qx128, do games w Ubisoft announces studio closure as it lays off 185 staff

    If their customers are going to have to get used to not owning games they paid for, I guess Ubisoft is going to get used to not having money 🤷🏻

    Scolding7300,

    Works for steam tho Edit: apparently Ubisoft wanted subscriptions, so steam isn’t exactly comparable

    Lemminary,

    Gross. Good riddance!

    OsrsNeedsF2P,

    In addition to Steam not being subscriptions, Valve has so far not screwed over their users. The way the Ubisoft exec suggested that we should change our attitude really showed what they in plan

    thingsiplay, do gaming w Unity CEO John Riccitiello 'retiring' from company weeks after pricing controversy
    @thingsiplay@kbin.social avatar

    He almost destroyed EA. Switched to Unity and almost destroyed Unity. Now what project does he join next?

    takeda,

    Maybe Comcast, Facebook or Twitter? Do something good for a change.

    dannoffs,
    @dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

    Twitter already has a weirdo gutting it from the inside.

    riplin,

    I hope he goes to nestle.

    thingsiplay,
    @thingsiplay@kbin.social avatar

    Maybe FIFA organization for their official FIFA game? I mean has "experience" with it.

    RIPandTERROR,
    @RIPandTERROR@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

    I fucking don’t. Imagine WTF it would take for people to lose their shit effectively with that company?

    ripcord,
    @ripcord@kbin.social avatar

    Did he do things over the last 10 years at Unity that almost destroyed them, or was it just this one thing?

    AdmiralShat, (edited )

    He’s been involved in several of the big Unity scandals, yes.

    This most recent event wasn’t one thing, it was a culmination of poor decisions. If Unity had been sunshine and rainbows all up until now, then the reaction wouldn’t have been so bad. It was the final nail in the coffin, really.

    Since he’s been involved, it’s been fuck up after fuck up.

    Bldck,

    Examples?

    smeg,

    Off the top of my head there’s failing to prepare for massive changes to the ads they could run on Apple and Google’s platforms and then realising that the money they were making was way less than expected, purchasing a company associated with malware, calling game developers “fucking idiots”, growing the company enormously over lockdown and then realising they’ve pissed all their money away. I don’t really know what a CEO actually does so a lot of that could be just company decisions, but JR definitely seems like a loose cannon who can’t help being wildly unprofessional.

    Moonguide,

    Even if that decision wasn’t exclusively his, he must’ve heard of it, and if he didn’t, even worse.

    ripcord,
    @ripcord@kbin.social avatar

    Thanks

    Bldck,

    Hilarious. Thanks

    blindsight,

    The Unity engine itself is also being badly neglected, with long-standing bugs that crash the developer tools, or so I hear.

    interolivary,
    !deleted5791 avatar

    There was also a bunch of sexual harrassment that was swept under the rug. He’s an incredible scumbag and a shitty CEO, which is why the psychopaths that inhabit corporate boards seem to love him

    Wirrvogel,
    @Wirrvogel@feddit.de avatar

    9 years of everyone telling him that forcing the UNITY splash screen on “baby’s first game” was a bad idea and was hurting the engine, because people were assuming all games made in the engine were bad, because good games didn’t show they also used Unity. Now that he is gone this changes.

    Also he is a huge fan of the “metaverse” idea: venturebeat.com/…/unity-ceo-john-riccitiello-the-… and I am sure some of Unity’s money went there at a time they could not afford it and with nothing to show for it.

    ripcord,
    @ripcord@kbin.social avatar

    Like what?

    Lowbird,

    I wonder if he’s actually just becoming a career scapegoat, taking the fall + a nice severance package(?) for decisions that were made by groups.

    storksforlegs,
    @storksforlegs@beehaw.org avatar

    Yes, a bastard-for-hire.

    LoafyLemon, (edited )

    I've heard he's planning to run for the president of the US by 2030. \s

    thejml,

    Nah, he’ll still be too young.

    Tyfud,

    He’s going to be in stiff competition with an orange jackass for cratering the US.

    i_am_not_a_robot,

    He might not be the best but he surely wouldn’t be the worst candidate.

    50gp,

    he would fit ubisoft

    Reverendender, do games w Game prices are too low, says Capcom exec
    @Reverendender@lemmy.world avatar

    I think my salary should go up

    AnUnusualRelic,
    @AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world avatar

    Have you considered being a CEO for a gaming corporation?

    Reverendender,
    @Reverendender@lemmy.world avatar

    I’m still working on “Be attractive. Don’t be unattractive.”

    applebusch,

    Have you seen many CEOs? Those aren’t requirements.

    MJBrune, do gaming w SAG-AFTRA votes unanimously to expand its strike to include the games industry

    What people might not catch is that this isn’t artists, designers or engineers. It’s voice actors only. I’m all for people getting what they deserve but as I see voice actors in the games industry demand profit sharing and more rights, I’m reminded that those who actually make the games don’t get that. They have overtime without pay.

    Lowbird,

    Voice actors are among “those who actually make the games.” Voice acting in particular also is strenuous work that can and does cause physical injury when workers are compelled to work long hours doing rough voices and so on. People end up having to have surgery on their vocal cords.

    We don’t need to devalue voice actors to value other game industry workers. The only difference is the voice actors organized first, probably because of the injury risk, and when you form a union you have to define a group that you can reach and coordinate. It shouldn’t be an us vs them among works.

    comicallycluttered,

    Don’t forget mocap. A lot of actors are doing mocap for games now, which also potentially results in injury.

    This also includes stunt workers (who do the more intensive motion capture work) and stunt coordinators, many of whom are in the Screen Actors Guild already.

    MJBrune,

    They should then let engineers, artists, and designers in their union.

    Snowcano,

    There are different unions for different trades. Stop trying to sound so smart, you keep failing.

    MJBrune,

    There are no unions for those trades in games currently. I’m not trying to sound smart. I am trying to tell you why I think VAs are overreaching here.

    barsoap,

    Oh, great, trade unions. That never caused any issues for worker’s unity. If you can’t organise everyone, from tech lead to cleaning staff, in the same industrial union you’re playing right into the capitalists’ divide and conquer game.

    crapwittyname,

    Not so. It makes sense to organise in trade unions. The heads of those unions are on the same side most of the time, as it would be in this case, and they can easily coordinate their actions. But in some cases the interests of one trade have no bearing on another, or are even in opposition, in which case it would be somewhere between difficult and impossible to organise a balloted action across the entire union. Thus nullifying the strength of the union and playing right into the capitalist’s hands.

    barsoap,

    So instead of coming to terms with your fellow workers you rather have them fight capitalists by themselves? Leave them to the scraps the bosses deem sufficient while you’re wheeling away a wagonload of concessions won through your unique bargaining power?

    You’re limiting the strength of worker’s. If train conductors don’t strike for train toilet cleaners noone will.

    And any opposition between worker’s interests is negligible compared to that between workers and capital, who have no interests in common at all.

    crapwittyname,

    You’ve misread my comment I think. Unions can coordinate and organise together. So nobody would be leaving their fellow worker to fight by themselves.

    hypelightfly,

    They need to unionize too. Also count actors are included in the "actually make the games" group. Everyone should be paid well, don't drag a group trying to fix that down because the rest aren't doing anything.

    MJBrune,

    My bad I didn’t mean to imply they don’t work on the game.

    sadreality,

    Well maybe every one should be getting a Lil slice? Ehh

    MJBrune,

    Yeah, that’s how I run my studio.

    Bipta,

    I’m reminded that those who actually make the games don’t get that. They have overtime without pay.

    Yes, capitalism fucks everyone every day unless you fight for what you deserve, usually for decades, and even then only getting half of it. It's surprising that keeping this in mind requires reminders.

    Crankpork,

    A better deal for one group helps the rest of them by setting precedent.

    RandoCalrandian,
    @RandoCalrandian@kbin.social avatar

    Or ensures the others get locked out, as the business feels the financial sting of the first effort

    FlowVoid,

    Voice actors have a union.

    Designers and engineers generally don’t. Yet.

    fracture,

    for those in america, CWA, Communication Workers of America, is a union that’s trying to reach out to the developers in the game industry

    ampersandrew,
    @ampersandrew@kbin.social avatar

    I think they asked for that in the last strike, but I haven't seen it mentioned in this one. And some speculated it was only included for something they could drop in the eventual resolution as a form of compromise.

    MJBrune,

    The Bayonetta lady was asking for profits and took to Twitter to boycott the game when she didn’t get what she wanted. Claiming that she made those games what they are.

    ampersandrew,
    @ampersandrew@kbin.social avatar

    That's not this strike though.

    MJBrune,

    I never said it was about this strike directly but instead overall how VAs have been pushing to get more than those on the front line of game creation.

    bermuda,

    You say VAs plural but then gave a singular example

    MJBrune,

    Here is an article going back to 2015 talking about sag atfra asking for gross profits gameinformer.com/…/developing-video-game-voice-ac…

    Paradox, do games w Images leak of Valve's next game, and it's an Overwatch-style hero shooter
    @Paradox@lemdro.id avatar

    overwatch style

    You mean team fortress style

    VindictiveJudge,
    @VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world avatar

    They had better call it Team Fortress 2 Episode 1.

    WereCat,

    Team Fortress: Archimedes

    Skepticpunk, (edited )

    Team Fortress Alpha: Mercenaries’ Dreams

    Donjuanme,

    Love my plushie, haven’t played but maybe 3-4 hours since acquiring it a decade ago, still have the plushie though.

  • Wszystkie
  • Subskrybowane
  • Moderowane
  • Ulubione
  • rowery
  • sport
  • muzyka
  • fediversum
  • Technologia
  • esport
  • test1
  • NomadOffgrid
  • slask
  • retro
  • Spoleczenstwo
  • krakow
  • giereczkowo
  • MiddleEast
  • Blogi
  • Gaming
  • Pozytywnie
  • tech
  • informasi
  • Psychologia
  • FromSilesiaToPolesia
  • niusy
  • Cyfryzacja
  • lieratura
  • ERP
  • kino
  • shophiajons
  • warnersteve
  • Wszystkie magazyny