W 24h zebrała 100mln USD darowizn na kampanię. W niecałe 48h ogarnęła dość delegatów, by mieć zapewnioną nominację Partii Demokratycznej, oraz zapewniła sobie poparcie wszystkich Demokratycznych gubernatorów i całej wierchuszki partii.
Ze scenariuszem “Biden rezygnuje z ubiegania się o reelekcję” najbardziej martwiłem się, że Partia Demokratyczna się zachowa jak zwykle – kompletny chaos, obrzucanie się błotem. To by dało Trumpowi wygraną bez problemu.
Ale teraz, kurczę, nie wygląda to źle! W tych wyborach praktycznie nikt nikogo nie przekona do zmiany, na kogo chce zagłosować. Pytanie jest oto, ilu wyborców i ile wyborczyń zostanie w domach. Wygląda na to, że Harris mocno generuje entuzjazm, a więc mocno pomoże ludzi przekonać, by iść na wybory.
Generalnie czniać wszelką hegemonię i imperializm, ale Trump byłby realną katastrofą. Patrz: Project 2025.
Other people have mentioned Paradox several times, and they are unquestionably the big name of the grand strat genre. Their main games are:
Hearts of Iron. WW2 setting, pretty much exclusively about war. If you want to flex your strategic skills, this is the one to get.
Victoria. The 100 years before WW2. Primarily about industrialisation. Victoria games have by far the most in-depth economy systems.
Europa Universalis. These ones are about the era of European colonialism, spanning three to four hundred years with the Napoleonic wars at the end. EU4 is pretty the most like a Total War campaign map in feel.
Crusader Kings. 700 years of feudalism. The map in these ones is limited to Europe, the western half of Asia, and the north of Africa. Distinct in that you play as a dynasty rather than a country. These ones are the most roleplay-heavy
Stellaris. This is the only one I haven't played, so I'm afraid I can't say much about it
Listen, Crusader Kings 3 is really interesting. You’re specifically playing the ruler of your nation, not the nation itself. You’ll play as your heir when you die. It’s much more roleplay oriented than other grand strategy games. Even Total War Three Kingdoms with its focus on the characters and their relationships doesn’t come close. Give it a look.
Stellaris also has recently received a subscription model, so if you want to just dip your toes it might be a lot cheaper for you to buy a month and get all possible dlc content for the game automatically (during that period).
Civilization is also an obvious answer that I’m not seeing mentioned. I feel like it’s more manageable than Stellaris, especially older versions (I tend to play IV or V).
And older game that people seem to like a lot is Sword of the Stars (2008), while despising the 2nd for lacking features and bugs aplenty. You can get it on GOG too, if you prefer, and being old makes it very cheap even out of a sale. I’ve tried it once but got slightly intimidated by the UI, but then again I barely spent 10 minutes in game (I also gave up on X3 the very first time I played, so…)
For a “lite” version of space empire building, Sins of a Solar Empire can probably satisfy you as well. It’s an RTS, you only play skirmishes, but there’s a lot of setting up new colonies, researching new tech, building stuff besides shipyards, propping up your fleet, etc. Combat doesn’t require a lot of micromanagement, usually just using a capital ship’s power every few seconds and defining target priorities.
Korzystam z Invidious, jest to mirror dla YT i jest kilka instancji, np. yewtu.beDziała w tle (przynajmniej przez Firefox Focus) i bez reklam, ale czasami trzeba znaleźć instancję którą YT nie blokuje (na szczęście jest przycisk “Switch instances”)
Not sure it strictly counts as Grand Strategy as it’s more of a sandbox, but X4 might be up your alley on the sci-fi front. Build a galaxy spanning empire from a single ship; complete missions, mine, trade, explore. You -can- fly the ships, but you don’t have to. You can just sit in a station issuing orders.
bin.pol.social
Najstarsze