pcgamer.com

DiabolicalBird, do games w Steam's new disclaimer reminds everyone that you don't actually own your games, GOG moves in for the killshot: Its offline installers 'cannot be taken away from you'

This has literally always been the case with Steam, the only difference is that people are told up front now. Things will likely continue to operate exactly the same as it has until now, I doubt Valve wants to disrupt the giant money train they have.

lud,

I would be surprised if it even was possible for them to change so that the games are bought. I suspect that would be quite complicated legally.

CaptnNMorgan,

It’s literally in the title that GOG does exactly that. Why would Steam’s hands be legally tied if GOG’s aren’t?

lud,

No, that isn’t what GOG is doing.

GOG is still only licencing games to you. They do offer you the opportunity to download an offline installer though.

kshade,
@kshade@lemmy.world avatar

As far as I know there is no mandatory DRM on Steam either, so if a publisher wants to they can just make their game be portable and not require Steam to even be installed. Pretty sure all the re-releases that use DOSBox or ScummVM are like this, for example.

lud, (edited )

Yeah there are loads of DRM free games on steam (mostly indies of course). Steam just offers a very basic (and easily bypassable if you know how) DRM to devs/publishers but they absolutely don’t need to use it.

CaptnNMorgan,

How is having an offline installer that can’t be taken away, not the same thing as owning?

lud,

Because you are still only licensed the game

CaptnNMorgan,

So, “licensed” is a legal term. Explain to me how being able to keep something forever, isn’t the same as owning?

lud,

I’m speaking in a legal sense. Please reread my original comment.

CaptnNMorgan,

But why couldn’t Steam “legally” offer offline installers the way gog does?

wildcardology, do gaming w Dr Disrespect fired by the game studio he co-founded: 'It is our duty to act with dignity on behalf of all individuals involved'

I love how nickmercs defends him by saying that there’s no evidence but keeps accusing the LGBTQ of pedophilia without evidence.

Chozo,
@Chozo@fedia.io avatar

Nickmercs has always been a piece of shit. I feel like he's only ever stepped up to bat for his friends when they've actually done some heinous shit, so seeing his defense of Doc only further confirms my belief that he did it.

Nickmercs' support is an unexpected canary in this coal mine.

uhN0id,

It’s like when people that cheat on others in their relationships start accusing their partners of cheating or have major trust issues because of their guilt (or whatever it is). And by that same logic I conclude that Nickmercs is a pedo (if he can do it with the LGBTQ community without evidence then he wouldn’t mind me making similarly wild claims about him, right?).

snekerpimp, do gaming w Casper Van Dien is loving the Starship Troopers renaissance but still finds it mind-boggling some take it at face value

“Mind bottling. You know, when things are so crazy it gets your thoughts all trapped, like in a bottle”

Sanctus,
@Sanctus@lemmy.world avatar

I mean he’s right but god damn.

Masamune,

“It’s a moo point. Like a cow’s opinion, you know, it just doesn’t matter.”

Semi_Hemi_Demigod,
@Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world avatar

It’s all water under the fridge

samus12345,
@samus12345@lemmy.world avatar

Don’t take things for granite.

xkforce, do games w Star Citizen's first-person shooting is getting backpack-reloading, dynamic crosshairs, procedural recoil, and other improvements to 'bring the FPS combat to AAA standard'

I mean… it should given the playerbase has thrown a billion dollars into it.

RealFknNito,
@RealFknNito@lemmy.world avatar

No no, it should release immediately despite being incomplete because people are throwing tantrums.

It should do a Cyberpunk 2077 because that went really really well for CDPR.

reflectedodds, (edited )

I “bought” this game when I was in high school. I’ve graduated high school, college, and I’ve been in the workforce for 7 years. Still no game.

So yes, they should figure out this game is going to be, set a launch date, and work towards that schedule. This forever-in-development thing they have going on is ridiculous.

Edit: Alright, it’s not fair to say “still no game.” There is a game you can download and play, but the question I have is does it have all the bells and whistles you expect from a complete game, or is it a technical demo with some game features? See my other comment in this comment chain for why my opinion is what it is.

RealFknNito,
@RealFknNito@lemmy.world avatar

“Still no game” see, this bad faith shit you do is just chef’s kiss. You can go play it right this second. Their updates to this point are open to play. Right now. “Still no game” isn’t just dishonest it’s a fucking lie and you keep saying it.

They don’t have to set a launch date, they don’t have to put down in writing for you what the game is going to be, and they have roadmaps and are updating the game constantly. You are owed fucking nothing more than what you’ve been given and you throwing a tantrum about it isn’t just frustrating, it’s childish.

If you don’t like the development cycle, move the fuck on and stop bitching about it. You have a life, right? 7 years in the workforce. Play a different game and stop letting this one live rent free in your head. As a grown man, that should be pretty easy. Let the developers decide what they do with their game and if you don’t like it, nobody is making you play it. Nobody is making you keep up with it. And the constant posts of people bitching and moaning “Why isn’t it out yet? Fuckin’ scammers >:(” drive me up a fucking wall.

It’s been a decade and people still rage bait this game.

reflectedodds,

Here I’ll add some context

It is pretty easy not to think about this game, it does not live rent free in my brain. I bought the promise of a space ship over a decade ago when there really was no game. The “game” then was here is your spaceship in a garage, stare at it and marvel. That was the whole game.

Over time i’ve seen bits and pieces of it in my feed, I remember when they added being able to fly the spaceship, idk when that was, but again that was the whole game. You could see pretty space but still no substance.

That was really my last experience with it because I think somewhere around this point is probably where I started working full time and stopped really following game news.

Flash forward to today I see this post to see the game is still a work in progress, I shared my opinion.

So if there is a decent game by now with a plot that would be great, I would give it a shot. But if it’s still just a fancy tech demo where you can run around for a bit but there’s really nothing to “do” then I’ll wait another decade.

yamanii,
@yamanii@lemmy.world avatar

So far it’s just about amassing money, nothing more.

goferking0,

I still can’t play the one I actually bought, Squadron 42, so no there’s no game. There’s a live demo for star citizen but nothing but promises for the one they said would come out first

RealFknNito,
@RealFknNito@lemmy.world avatar

So this hyper specific thing that they changed focus from is why you shitcan the entire rest of the game? The story driven campaign that takes a lot more time and resources you’re upset about taking time to develop? Like come on man. This really is Cyberpunk all over again. Just let them work. Go play Helldivers 2.

goferking0,

Yes me pointing out they still haven’t done the part I paid for is shit canning the game. I’m sorry I don’t want to just play a tech demo while I wait for the game.

Also bad analogy as cyberpunk was playable and launched

RealFknNito,
@RealFknNito@lemmy.world avatar

Notice how “Squadron 42” has a different name than “Star Citizen”? You bought the tech demo for a module of a larger game when you could have waited because clearly you’re not interested in the tech demo. Development isn’t a straightforward process and you had to know that going in. Sorry you think there’s “no game” because the section you wanted isn’t done yet. You’re just wrong.

Cyberpunk released nearly unplayable under the pressure of people threatening to kill the developers for pushing back the release date too many times. Almost like they shouldn’t have put a release date. You seem wildly uninformed about both games.

goferking0,

You do realize the original kickstarter and pitch was for squadron 42 right? And by backing you’d get extras in the form of the MMO Star Citizen universe coming out after the SP Squadron 42.

www.kickstarter.com/projects/cig/star-citizen

Honestly I don’t think you know anything about either…

Reasons You’ll Want to Play Star Citizen

A huge universe to explore, trade and adventure in Space is unending, endless and so are your opportunities. Strike out to make your fortune amongst the Stars or sign-up for a tour of duty in the UEE Fleet.

Constantly expanding and evolving universe We’re committed to making Star Citizen a living, breathing universe that is its own entity. It will be a constantly shifting and evolving place for players to explore and affect.

Micro updates rule! We’re not interested in having yearly updates. Once live, we will have a team of people adding content on a weekly or bi-weekly basis. So we’ll always be adding data, stories and campaigns as well as reacting to the needs and actions of the players.

Squadron 42 - A Wing Commander style single player mode, playable OFFLINE if you want Playable offline or online, co-op with friends, you sign up for a tour of duty with the UEE fleet, manning the front lines, protecting settlements from Vanduul warbands.

Life during wartime If you distinguish yourself in combat, you might be invited to join the legendary 42nd Squadron. Much like the French Foreign Legion of old, they can always be found in the toughest areas of operation and always snatch victory from the jaws of defeat, regardless of the odds.

The conflict never ends Upon completion of your tour you’ll re-enter the persistent Star Citizen universe with some credits in your pocket and Citizenship to help you make your way. But in the universe of Star Citizen when one conflict ends, another is just around the corner. You’ll have opportunity to spend more time with your squadron mates as additional Campaigns are released as part of the content update plan.

RealFknNito,
@RealFknNito@lemmy.world avatar

And unlike most kickstarter scams, they’re still trying to honor that original pledge.

Notice they didn’t promise an exact date? Damn that’s wild. You wanted to be an early backer so congrats, the monkey’s paw curls and now you need to grow up because you somehow haven’t over the course of the development of the game you keep whining about taking so long.

The adults who backed this project with WAY more money than you are still mature enough to put this in the back of their mind and go about their life with the assurance CIG will make good on these pledges. Helldivers 2 is a great game and there’s no kickstarter for you to buy and bitch about later.

goferking0,

I’m confused why you are so adamant nothing is wrong and why you keep saying helldivers as an alternative.

RealFknNito,
@RealFknNito@lemmy.world avatar

Because nothing is wrong with a development time that’s longer than you want it to be and Helldivers is a fun game.

n3m37h,

Last I checked it’s still an ALPHA. World of Tanks was at least a working beta since it was released in 2010.

RealFknNito,
@RealFknNito@lemmy.world avatar

Okay, why is that a problem that it’s “in alpha”? These are made up fucking terms that change meaning based on the people using them.

n3m37h,

It’s been an ALPHA since I first play tested sometime in 2016. In that time Halo Infinite released with a more polished game than this shitty tech demo

RealFknNito,
@RealFknNito@lemmy.world avatar

8 years of development. Oh no. That’s the average range for a normal development cycle.

Fuck off with this stupid shit already.

n3m37h,

You know there is development done before they can release anything right?

Pre production started in 2010, production started in 2011.

My math says that is 13 years not 8

Stop simping for a con artist

// Forgot this incase ya wanted to check for yourself

p03locke,
@p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

This forever-in-development thing they have going on is ridiculous.

It’s a feature, not a bug.

RealFknNito,
@RealFknNito@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah, 8 years. The typical game development cycle. For Star Citizen, the well known highly ambitious game. You people can’t even wait until it takes them longer than a typical fucking cycle to bitch and moan about how long it’s taking. Fuck off already.

EchoCT,

Go play it and tell me there is no game there. You already own it. So install it and find out.

n3m37h,

I bought 2 ships in 2014… Your point is fucking moot

RealFknNito,
@RealFknNito@lemmy.world avatar

That means literally fucking nothing to the comment you’re replying to.

goferking0,

They don’t seem well in the head with their blind devotion

Jimbo, do gaming w Nintendo is suing the makers of the Switch emulator Yuzu, claims 'There is no lawful way to use Yuzu'
@Jimbo@yiffit.net avatar

Well that is just straight up factually wrong

Toribor,
@Toribor@corndog.social avatar

It’s utterly ridiculous how copyright law has been twisted to erode the very idea of ownership. Does it have software on it? Well then it’s not just against the terms of service… It’s illegal!

MossyFeathers, do games w VR still makes 40-70% of players want to throw up, and that's a huge problem for the companies behind it
@MossyFeathers@pawb.social avatar

Some researchers did a study several years ago and found that adding a virtual nose decreased motion sickness significantly. However, I don’t think I’ve seen any developers try this. I wonder if it’d help.

MarcomachtKuchen,

Id love to See that. I cant even imagine how interesting some of These noses for Alien games might Look

SuckMyWang,

Have they discovered a link between people with big noses and less motion sickness? Imo these are the more important questions that will drive humanity forward

Carighan,
@Carighan@lemmy.world avatar

You can always see your own nose BTW, your brain just usually excludes it from what you actively notice.

SuckMyWang,

Yes although I’m hypothesising large nose peoples brains will be doing this with a larger area hence the greater effects against motion sickness. It could lead to novel treatments for motion sickness like wearing a big nose while riding on a bus.

Swedneck,
@Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Virtual glass frames

LordOfTheChia,

adding a virtual nose decreased motion sickness significantly

Behold, the VR headset of the future!

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/3da7e4a5-8be2-43b6-bb16-c752990e8f6c.jpeg

Aux, do games w Todd Howard asked on-air why Bethesda didn't optimise Starfield for PC: 'We did [...] you may need to upgrade your PC'

I don’t know what your problem is, guys. When Skyrim was released, NVIDIA had GT 5xx series. Skyrim barely run at 40 FPS on Ultra on 1080p on a GT 560. Today, according to Gamers Nexus, Starfield runs at 60 FPS average on GTX 4060.

So, Starfield is better optimised than Skyrim was. Go buy a new GPU.

pulsewidth, do games w 10 years later, no one has replicated Rocket League's mojo

TLDR: dunno if anyone wants to replicate it today, because the experience of early years Rocket League is completely gone now. So ‘they’ dont even have a reference point to replicate.

Psyonix fumbled RL so hard its not funny. I have 1500 hours on Steam since launch. In my experience, like with a lot of competitive online games, RL became more and more sweaty and toxic as time progressed - it’s already not the largest pool of players, and even when queuing casual matches you’re matchmade with similarly-skilled players - so once you’ve been playing for say 50 hours you find yourself in quite a few toxic matches with higher-skill players. But, there was thankfully a remedy - anyone wanting to chill simply used the fun modes (snow day, rumble, and hoops) and told anyone who was toxic in game to get bent. I had a crew of several dozen regulars that I’d befriended and we enjoyed hitting those modes because they were taken much less seriously than the standard 2v2 or 3v3 matches. Many many laughs had over the years I played. Then Psyonix retired those modes from the casual queue/playlist and made them competitive-only around 2019 - no reason cited. This pretty much quadrupled the queue times for those modes, and ensured the matches were higher stakes (rank points) and more toxic. Why?

This was not the first or last time Psyonix made decisions that the community at large hated. Every controversial change they made was met with a lot of pleading on the forums (and Reddit) with devs to reverse course, which they would hand wave with ‘we’ll take this feedback on board’ kind of responses, then as time ticked on we saw lootbox after lootbox/decal/season-pass/timed-exclusive-grind-drops/paid-cars hit the game… And dev focus started to become clear. Before you say ‘they had to pay for the game’, this was all before the game went F2P. It became obvious that dev priority was ways to make the game even more of a dopamine-to-wallet loop, and casual fun is not a priority, they wanted an e-sports scene. I guess the casual players fit none of those goals.

At that point my RL friends persisted gettinf together regularly for private matches (so we could still load the fun modes), but the ability to just load into the game and queue up some relaxed no-stakes silly car soccer (or hockey, or basketball) was long gone for experienced regulars - i can’t imagine it was easy for new players to get into the game at that point. Gg. Haven’t even had it installed for a few years now, and I read now they removed the ‘fun modes’ entirely from the ranked queue options now, so they just come back for seasonal events? Why??

Psyonix had a money printer and they broke it by trying to make the money print faster. Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk.

VolumetricShitCompressor,

“WHAT A SAVE!”

“WHAT A SAVE!”

“WHAT A SAVE!”

pulsewidth,

“NICE SHOT!”
“NICE SHOT!”
“GREAT PASS!”

In their defense I don’t think they could have come up with any standard chat lines that wouldn’t be used sarcastically by toxic players.

If I was a dev if you spammed the lines 3 times in a row I’d change the third one to something to diffuse the hate, from a random selection of lines that are hard to take sarcastically. "I love you! ", “Wooo!”, etc

D_C,

I bought the game about 6 months after it was released and I had over 3000 hours in that game before I stopped playing a few years back.

The first 1200+ hours was in Snowday alone, and I doubt I’ll ever have as much fun in a video game than I did in that mode. I started to play all the modes plus the steam workshop mods (for hundreds of hours) just to get better car control to play Snowday.
Unfortunately at the end it was all competitive and it had started to be more of a chore than fun but I stand by those first thousands of hours at the most fun I’ve ever had.

Hell, most of the time even the losing part of Snowday was enjoyable when playing against and with the right people.

pulsewidth,

Yeah i’ll remember the good times fondly for sure. In its peak it was a great time and I don’t regret the time spent one bit.

The puck added a fun dimension, being able to fairly effortlessly run it up walls or onto the roof (compared to the ball), and the wonderful semi-glitchy physics of pinch hits on the flat surface of a puck. Nothing like pinch-hitting it against another player’s vehicle and watching the puck rocket unstoppably across into the goal. “Calculated”.

Yermaw,

Im completely oblivious to any of the enshittification, but like any online game the fun is long gone for most people. Skill floor is way too high. As soon as you join a match youre completely outskilled by everybody and its clear youre nothing but a hindrance to your team.

Your opponents laugh at you and style as hard as they can and your teammates resent your existence, assuming they stick around long enough to make it clear.

Hyper-competitive games are fun for about 3 months and then youre either in or out.

pulsewidth,

Yeah agreed. Best time to get into most competition games is when they’re in their ‘growing playerbase’ phase with lots of new players, still room for casual players. Then they slowly get pushed out.

There’s room for modes that encourage casual fun though to keep that part of the playerbase active, which is what made Psyonix’s decisions so frustrating.

edgemaster72,
@edgemaster72@lemmy.world avatar

Old Snow Day my beloved, how I miss thee

Phegan, do games w Bethesda Game Studios developers form 'wall to wall' union that includes artists, designers, and programmers

HiddenLayer5, do gaming w Gabe Newell on why game delays are okay: 'Late is just for a little while. Suck is forever.'
@HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml avatar

suck is forever

Why is the consumer just expected to roll over and take it when a game sucks instead of the responsibility being on the publisher to release updates until the game resembles what was originally advertised? Games aren’t on ROM cartridges anymore, you can still improve the game after it’s released.

Look, No Man’s Sky set the precedent for what you’re supposed to do when your game sucks at launch. And we should expect nothing less from game studios with ten times the person-power and money.

Maestro,
@Maestro@kbin.social avatar

No Man's Sky is a great redemption arc, but it would have been better if the game hadn't sucked at launch

HiddenLayer5,
@HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml avatar

Obviously sucking at launch is bad. But it’s inevitable that some games will suffer that fate and as No Man’s Sky showed, that’s no excuse for the game continuing to suck after launch.

Chariotwheel,

Yeah, if a product is sold, I expect it to work for the most part. Now, mistakes happen, and not much to do about very obscure things and it's great if thing can be added afterwards.

But what I want, and this is apparently wild, is a finished 1.0 product that works as expected.

Skullgrid,
@Skullgrid@lemmy.world avatar

I pre ordered no man’s sky, because the people who made fucking Joe Danger said “I’m going to procedurally generate a universe”

I played it a bit at launch, but the antihype, especially spoilers about the ending made me stop. It’s a bit dense to try to get back into at the moment, but I regret nothing. I paid a modicum so that the guys that made Joe Danger could make a universe, and because me and people like me didn’t demand a refund, they got to do it.

Kingofthezyx,

Thanks, because I bought it after it got good and I’ve put 1000+ hours into it.

jonne,

Yeah, if their publisher hadn’t forced them to release in its unfinished state, it would’ve been a lot better.

Zorque,

It's not a redemption arc, it's a people forgetting it exists except for those who want mediocre resource accumulation simulators.

BarrierWithAshes,
@BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social avatar

I was gonna write. I agree with him but No Man's Sky kinda defeats his point.

slaacaa,

Agree. Also the same with CP77 - I don’t care how much they update and polish that game, I’m not touching it again. It was barely playable on XBOX1X on release. I luckily was able to sell my launch day copy with a small loss, but I’m not trusting them with my money again, after I (and many others) have been misled, and given an unplayable game on consoles.

I am not an investor to lend money to the company for development, I am a consumer, so I want a working game for my money on Day 1, otherwise I’m shopping elsewhere - as plenty of studios manage to great and polished games (e.g. most PS exclusives).

Maestro,
@Maestro@kbin.social avatar

I always wait a few years before buying a game. It prevents situations like this and saves aot of money to boot. Not just the game price but also because I don't need the highest spec pc

MeanEYE,
@MeanEYE@lemmy.world avatar

I have no proof but in my eyes it all smells like Sony and other gaming news are to blame. They hyped up the game to unachievable levels and then held Hellogames to the previously set deadline. I am very happy they sat down and finished the game, although there is new content patch ever few months still. Gave them those 60$ happily even though it’s not my kind of game.

RedWeasel,

CP2077 had a bunch of issues on release as well. Much better now. I feel like they(developers) need to bring in different testers near release. If you have the same testers whom have been testing builds for years it can probably be hard to see the issues with the same clarity.

Also stop having release dates. Just use vague terms like 2nd half 2024. When you get the release build, anounce a date, like a month later, give your devs a couple weeks off as there will be missed bugs after release. Hard release dates aren’t helping these situations.

slaacaa,

It’s not about unknown issues on the dev side, it’s about greed. CDPR wanted to release for Xmas when the large playerbase of the prev gen consoles was still relevant, so they happily pushed marketing and lied to take people’s money, hoping they can pay exec bonuses and fund future development from that.

Sony had to pull the game from the online store, as it was barely playable. One good question of course why Sony would let it even be there without testing, but of course major companies are trusted to QA themselves, and not release a broken game - luckily this seems to work most of the time.

superduperenigma,

Because people will pre-order games to the point that it’s made a healthy profit even before it’s even released. Consumers vote with their wallet and for some reason gamers just constantly choose to show publishers that shoddy, half-assed products are good enough for them.

helenslunch,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

Why is the consumer just expected to roll over and take it

They’re expected to do it because that’s exactly what they do, every time.

c0mbatbag3l,
@c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world avatar

Exactly, when you buy a shit product you should learn not to do the same thing. People are still out here buying crap and complaining on the internet where the money having developers couldn’t give less of a fuck.

SaakoPaahtaa,

And the same goes for microtransactions, devs put them in because gamers buy the everliving fuck out of them.

fox,

Gabe was talking about the making of Half Life, back when you shipped your disc and that was that. And the game was, apparently, crapola.

Same kind of deal with the original Deus Ex. It was a spaghetti of poorly interacting systems until the devs were able to make it all click together.

Redcuban1959,

Gabe was talking about the making of Half Life, back when you shipped your disc and that was that. And the game was, apparently, crapola.

There were patch and updates back in the day. The problem was that not everybody had a good internet connection or a connection at all, during the 90’s.

Games like Daikatana and SiN were flops due to bugs that required patches to fix.

Flyberius,
@Flyberius@hexbear.net avatar

I remember getting patches on my PC gamer discs. Good times

shiveyarbles,

It’s because that’s how capitalism works. If you keep buying stuff from the same source without due diligence, you can’t be surprised when you get stuck with another sucky game.

The only incentive to spend resources on fixing a game is to preserve reputation for future games.

slazer2au, do games w After earning $544 million in its most recent quarter, Unity says even more layoffs are 'likely'

From their quarterly SEC filing.

We are dependent on the success of our customers in the gaming market. Adverse events relating to our customers or their games could have a negative impact on our business

Remind me, why did you alienate your customer base with a per install fee Unity?

Alto, do games w After earning $544 million in its most recent quarter, Unity says even more layoffs are 'likely'
@Alto@kbin.social avatar

Headline really feels like it's trying to imply unity is currently making a profit. They haven't been out of the red in a while. Businesses tend to die when they're bleeding money and there's no VC.

Cheesus,

It’s a bit more complicated than that. There are a lot of accounting tricks to be constantly making losses but end up cash flow positive.

I don’t work or invest in Unity so I don’t have a great understanding of their metrics but companies I worked at would constantly capitalize new projects to add expenses in the future. You can structure sales deals so a new feature is added late in the contract. That pushes revenue out, but you can collect more cash early.

If unity didn’t do share buy backs this quarter, they would have a positive cash flow. Which points to they should be a profitable company but instead are using accounting tricks to post losses to lower tax bills.

stopthatgirl7, do gaming w Microsoft would buy Valve 'if opportunity arises,' said Phil Spencer in leaked email
!deleted7120 avatar

Microsoft wanting to buy Valve and Nintendo should tell you just how much what they really want is a monopoly on gaming.

jeebus,
@jeebus@kbin.social avatar

If Microsoft loves anything, it's monopolies.

Whirlybird,

They all want a monopoly, not just Microsoft. Microsoft are just the only ones that could afford it.

stopthatgirl7,
!deleted7120 avatar

Trudat

Dogiedog64, do games w Young men are 'playing videogames all day' instead of getting jobs because they can mooch off of free healthcare, claims congressman
@Dogiedog64@lemmy.world avatar

Is this Free Healthcare in the room with us now, you miserable ghoul?

SnowmenMelt, do games w 'No gay, no pay': The RuneScape community is absolutely mauling Jagex's new CEO over his decision to cancel new Pride Month events

There is a player run unofficial pride house party happening on the 21st

  • Wszystkie
  • Subskrybowane
  • Moderowane
  • Ulubione
  • muzyka
  • Blogi
  • NomadOffgrid
  • rowery
  • test1
  • esport
  • Technologia
  • FromSilesiaToPolesia
  • fediversum
  • ERP
  • krakow
  • shophiajons
  • informasi
  • retro
  • Travel
  • Spoleczenstwo
  • gurgaonproperty
  • Psychologia
  • Gaming
  • slask
  • nauka
  • sport
  • niusy
  • antywykop
  • lieratura
  • motoryzacja
  • giereczkowo
  • warnersteve
  • Wszystkie magazyny