I remember Alex not too long ago acting like optimization was not the problem with Alan Wake 2 and that the game truly just needed bigger and better cards to function. These people are so shamelessly pro-corporation. video actually made me irate.
I remember Alex not too long ago acting like optimization was not the problem with Alan Wake 2 and that the game truly just needed bigger and better cards to function.
Because that was actually true, he wasn’t wrong. From what I understand the game used features that are specific to new GPUs but mentioned the potential to have it fallback to something that can work on 10XX GPUs. Hence the update.
In terms of optimization, the game is really well optimized for the graphics it has, and runs well on new hardware.
Fallbacks are incredibly common. There are fall backs for Ray Tracing, for example. All of these are optimization.
Lacking this level of optimization from the start was a sham. And Alex helped let them.get away with it.
Thankfully the game flopped, Im sure in no small part to its inaccesibility on a larger range of hardware, so the devs lowered the functional requirements.
Digital Foundry puts tech demo featuresets over a reasonably designed game, every single time. Nvidia relies on these narratives to push wasteful hardware.
John and Richard are the only hosts I care about these days. Alex and Oliver have become insufferable .
I still don’t know if I’d call lower settings to be optimisations. I see optimisations to be ways of making the current solution to work faster and more efficient. Swapping out a process for a “lower” one because some hardware can’t support the original is not optimisation in my books, and pedantically doesn’t follow the definition either.
Playing the game now. It’s a lot of fun, some good changes but some negative changes from Remake. The open world portions are just gorgeous. The ubisoft towers and icons are kinda lame but it’s not just a scourge on the map so to speak. The sidequests have been pretty fun, and the soundtrack is awesome.
Storywise, it follows largely the same beats as the original with some changeups to the formula (I haven’t beaten it yet so I expect some wild changes @ the end like last time.). Gameplay is pretty neat but I preferred FF16’s DMC style combat.
All in all I wouldn’t buy it at $70, but at $50 it is well worth it
remake or original crisis core doesn’t really matter, they’re the same thing. I forgot about Intergrade, it’s a DLC after final fantasy 7 remake but it really is more like filler than anything useful.
I agree. My copy came yesterday and the PS5 is really holding this game back. The PC version can’t come soon enough. It also stinks that the first PC version will almost certainly end up being on Epic before steam.
It also stinks that the first PC version will almost certainly end up being on Epic before steam.
Square is super inconsistent with this stuff, that it’s pretty hard to tell what’s going to be an Epic Exclusive and what’s not. I do hope there’s not going to be a second exclusivity period, before it’s coming to Steam though.
It sure sounds like the money spent on those deals makes less and less sense, so I'll bet we see less of them going forward. Already the exclusivity period for this game is down to only about 3 months.
Mam też taki pomysł, że tak jak przechodząc przez drzwi można mówić “Darek otwórz”, tak przechodząc do następnego slajdu w prezentacji można od tej pory mówić “daj następny Józef” 🤣
Well it’s a legends title so we’ll likely be able to expect something like Legends Arceus gameplay wise, what I’ll be anticipating is if they’ll do a Galar/Kalos/Paldea super region since Britain France and the Iberian Peninsula are all right on top of each other, and also because of the Gaullic Empire memes it could spawn.
Based on the trailer, I am assuming the entire game is self-contained within the city, though I’d expect it to be a lot bigger than the city was in X and Y.
youtube.com
Gorące