pcgamer.com

SaneMartigan, do games w Battlefield 6 players are crying out for a 'real' server browser, and it's about time we demanded the basic FPS feature that Call of Duty killed
@SaneMartigan@aussie.zone avatar

BF6 is the only thing keeping me on windows. If they don’t include a server browser I’m not buying it.

daniskarma, do games w 'Consumers are not okay with okay': Take-Two boss says BioShock 4 is taking so long because the company's goal is 'to make the best entertainment, not necessarily the most entertainment'

I really disliked bioshock 3. So I have little hope.

The story was over the top but without saying anything interesting or iconic.

Gunplay is a weird mix between call of duty and bioshock and it doesn’t work.

Upgrade system along with only two weapons felt weird. Topics are less useful and less common than in previous games.

“Choices” in story are not choices, completely useless.

Companion AI is bland, they promised a revolution with Elisabeth but it’s just a fly tied on a cord, there’s zero AI in it. It can’t die so there’s nothing to interact. It just moves around you, pretend to seek supplies and to hide from bullets but it’s all fake, it cannot be hurt and she just tosses you supplies on scripted events.

The bird is hyped and have zero impact in the gameplay.

And I could go on…

Bioshock 1 is a thousand times better game in every single aspect.

Klear,

“Choices” in story are not choices, completely useless.

That, at least, is a staple for the series. Otherwise I mostly agree. I was enjoying the story and worldbuilding until about the time when the portals to other dimensions started appearing and the plot went sideways. From then on it was mostly bullshit they tried to explian by repeating “quantum mechanics” over and over.

Blueberrydreamer,

Making Elizabeth invincible is the only way that game is playable for me. There’s no chance in hell I’d play an entire game that’s one long escort quest where I’m constantly worried about the useless sidekick that I’d rather be without. She may not have added much, but a superficial narrative device is a thousand times better than a crippling gameplay decision.

Katana314,

Tbf, Resident Evil 4 managed to find some ways to get away with it.

TheHobbyist, do games w Battlefield 6 players are crying out for a 'real' server browser, and it's about time we demanded the basic FPS feature that Call of Duty killed

Having long played some old CS, there was so much sense of community from connecting to a personal server instance, regularly seeing the same people, familiarize with specific rules to that server, getting to know the admin etc. I’m sure you feel a sense of community from match making, but it can definitely exist outside of matchmaking IMO.

And I’m not advertising for one over the other. But I’d be very happy to see the persistence of accessing personal servers for a game.

voytrekk, (edited ) do games w Battlefield 6 players are crying out for a 'real' server browser, and it's about time we demanded the basic FPS feature that Call of Duty killed

It would be nice if we had both options. Let people matchmake for the default experience and let those that prefer custom servers to use those instead. There are problems with using only community hosted servers, such as game rules and less ideal admins.

That being said, the longevity that community servers offer is likely the reason they have been scrapped by EA. They want everyone to move to the next title that comes out like what people do with CoD.

EDIT: Typos from mobile

Tikiporch, do games w Battlefield 6 players are crying out for a 'real' server browser, and it's about time we demanded the basic FPS feature that Call of Duty killed

Article about BF6: shows picture of BF2042.

ampersandrew,
@ampersandrew@lemmy.world avatar

Because it talks about the same “Portal” feature in 2042 that came before.

griffinite_psx, do games w Battlefield 6 players are crying out for a 'real' server browser, and it's about time we demanded the basic FPS feature that Call of Duty killed
@griffinite_psx@lemmy.world avatar

A server browser similar to Arma would have been a godsend as it allows people to set up unique rules, experiment with different game modes and play around the map itself. While BF isn’t a milsim sandbox game a server browser is what keeps older BF games alive especially on console and the removal of that does make you wonder if we’ll be playing BF6 a decade down the line.

Grimy,

They are implementing just that. Official servers don’t show up on it but everything hosted by the community does.

Croquette, do games w Battlefield 6 players are crying out for a 'real' server browser, and it's about time we demanded the basic FPS feature that Call of Duty killed

Bring back community servers, so the developers can keep their official servers and people that want to play on community servers can do that do.

It’s a solved problem that publishers tells you is hard to do in the name of money.

Don’t look harder into it.

Grimy,

That’s exactly what they did. You have official matchmaking, then you have community servers people host. If you use official rules, you can still earn xp in the community servers.

They have a server browser, official matchmaking servers just don’t show up but they only last one game anyways.

justlemmyin, do games w Battlefield 6 players are crying out for a 'real' server browser, and it's about time we demanded the basic FPS feature that Call of Duty killed

Bit it doesn’t even work on linux, basically DOA for me.

Grass,

supposedly doesn’t work on windows either if you play valorant ar maybe other games with similar anticheats competing for the same system area no video game shoud have control over

rozodru,

ah so that post I saw the other day saying “begun the kernel wars have” makes senses. someone posted the fact they couldn’t play BF6 cause Valorant was installed.

Grass,

yeah. I’ve been wondering when this would happen since spore. Took longer than I expected really.

yermaw, do games w Battlefield 6 players are crying out for a 'real' server browser, and it's about time we demanded the basic FPS feature that Call of Duty killed

Server browsers are the better experience for me. Jump in a game and its already going, less pressure to stay because there’s no matchmaking ban/penalties. Everyone is there primarily to have fun because KD WL MMR ELO isnt being logged. If im desperately outclassed, or life gets in the way, I can just quit with no guilt or punishment. If im having a good time i can stay with mostly the same people for a long time.

Thats before you even get into the technicalities and longevity considerations.

rozodru,

Plus it’s great if the server is made specifically for a map you really love. Like TFC/TF2 with say 24/7 2fort. I love me some 2fort and yeah I will play it for hours on end, it’s comfy.

shadowedcross, do games w Battlefield 6 players are crying out for a 'real' server browser, and it's about time we demanded the basic FPS feature that Call of Duty killed
@shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works avatar

I want servers so I can avoid playing maps I don’t like… Looking at you Siege of Cairo.

poolhelmetinstrument, do games w Battlefield 6 players are crying out for a 'real' server browser, and it's about time we demanded the basic FPS feature that Call of Duty killed
@poolhelmetinstrument@lemmy.world avatar

More like a real server browser with real self hosted dedicated servers. Couldn’t imagine mods at this point

Baggie, do games w Battlefield 6 players are crying out for a 'real' server browser, and it's about time we demanded the basic FPS feature that Call of Duty killed

I miss community servers terribly.

scrubbles, do games w Battlefield 6 players are crying out for a 'real' server browser, and it's about time we demanded the basic FPS feature that Call of Duty killed
!deleted6348 avatar

God yes. I would rather have a few popular servers over endless empty matchmaking

Katana314, do games w Arkane employees demand Microsoft sever ties with Israeli military: 'We don’t want to be part of this sinister project for Gaza'

What sucks on my end is that this has only been the latest in a long chain of reasons to boycott Microsoft - so I can’t exactly claim, if they take a step back from “Systematically murdering innocent people” then I’ll go back to giving them money.

Blackmist, do games w 'Consumers are not okay with okay': Take-Two boss says BioShock 4 is taking so long because the company's goal is 'to make the best entertainment, not necessarily the most entertainment'

“we haven’t worked out where to shoehorn the micro-transactions in yet”

slaneesh_is_right,

It does wound an aweful lot like the whole skate. Situation. We really want to make the best game possible and we really care for customer feedback. Hmm turns out they really didn’t and just try to sell micro transactions

  • Wszystkie
  • Subskrybowane
  • Moderowane
  • Ulubione
  • esport
  • test1
  • NomadOffgrid
  • ERP
  • rowery
  • krakow
  • Gaming
  • Technologia
  • muzyka
  • Spoleczenstwo
  • sport
  • informasi
  • tech
  • healthcare
  • FromSilesiaToPolesia
  • fediversum
  • turystyka
  • Psychologia
  • Cyfryzacja
  • Blogi
  • shophiajons
  • retro
  • Travel
  • gurgaonproperty
  • slask
  • nauka
  • Radiant
  • warnersteve
  • Wszystkie magazyny