Personally I have used Mobilism for years and it is simply the best site to download apk with pay options unlocked, although sometimes there may be crashes, from my experience can I say it, but it is not the most normal.
Have you checked that the apk you are downloading is compatible with your device? For example, depending on the age of your device and the version of Android you should download apk that are armeabi-v7a (old architecture) or arm64-v8a (newer architecture), although there are also apks that bring all versions in one.
It’s not an architecture problem, as I said, I downloaded the same game from the same web and the modded one crashes while the normal one didn’t. I don’t understand…
Personally I have never used a Xiomi device to comment on whether it is a problem or not, but maybe it is, maybe it is like Windows Defender that deletes cracked .dll files when installing a pirated program or game and then the program does not start for no reason because of that.
I know that it’s been some time but I just found this. There’s an option on developer opts that allows you to see crash reports. This is what I get. I know this might not be the place to ask about this. But as it only happens with pirated / modded apks, support forms wont help me.
<span style="color:#323232;">java.lang.SecurityException: Not allowed to bind to service Intent { act=com.google.android.finsky.BIND_GET_INSTALL_REFERRER_SERVICE cmp=com.android.vending/com.google.android.finsky.externalreferrer.GetInstallReferrerService }
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> at android.app.ContextImpl.bindServiceCommon(ContextImpl.java:2050)
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> at android.app.ContextImpl.bindService(ContextImpl.java:1961)
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> at android.content.ContextWrapper.bindService(ContextWrapper.java:863)
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> at c1.b.d(Unknown Source:132)
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> at com.reactlibrary.RNInstallReferrerModule.getReferrer(Unknown Source:17)
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Native Method)
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> at com.facebook.react.bridge.JavaMethodWrapper.invoke(Unknown Source:148)
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> at com.facebook.react.bridge.JavaModuleWrapper.invoke(Unknown Source:147)
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> at com.facebook.jni.NativeRunnable.run(Native Method)
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:942)
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:99)
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> at com.facebook.react.bridge.queue.MessageQueueThreadHandler.dispatchMessage(Unknown Source:0)
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> at android.os.Looper.loopOnce(Looper.java:211)
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:300)
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> at com.facebook.react.bridge.queue.MessageQueueThreadImpl$4.run(Unknown Source:37)
</span><span style="color:#323232;"> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1012)
</span>
I use it because it is in the Megathread of FMHY, apart from that I have never had problems but obviously you have to use common sense because anyone can upload a file as in any torrent site. My setup is a firewall (RethinkDNS in my case) that blocks internet access to the application as soon as it is installed and suspicious domains, download only from known uploaders like Balatan and do not give permissions blindly, and when in doubt there is VirusTotal.
qBittorrent-nox is as separate as you can get. It can be run on the server without GUI. It also provides WebUI, that can be modified if you wish, but you don’t have to use it. Moreover, most (if not all) settings can be edited through the text file and torrents added using CLI.
qBittorrent, when Web-UI is enabled (doesn’t matter if it’s nox or not), provides and API too. IF you have a client you can connect and manage everything using it. However, the only clients I know are for android.
But that’s the literal point of WebUI of any program. To make it possible to connect and manage the program from any device from the remote machine. And there is a reason why most developers choose to use WebUI - you don’t have to create multiple cleants for every OS and every internet connected device has a web browser. In fact web browser can be considered the client in this scenario.
What could be the reason why anyone could be against WebUI? I can only think of one advantage of native client that has to be installed is that it would make of possible to associate torrent files and magnet links with it.
And lastly, if you would search for qbittorent remote client most likely in top 5 results you would find electorrent. I haven’t tried it but at least description claims that it can be used with qBittorrent.
Edit: heh it seems I managed to reply to my own comment.
piracy
Aktywne
Magazyn ze zdalnego serwera może być niekompletny. Zobacz więcej na oryginalnej instancji.