gamespot.com

MonkderDritte, do games w Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset

Ah, so that’s why it was lacking content.

someacnt_, do games w Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset

So some people are actually playing starfield?

Semjaza, do games w Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset

Has Bethesda actually released a decent game since Daggerfall?

hydroxycotton,

Ok boomer let’s get you to bed

Semjaza,

And in my day we couldn’t just send boomers to bed with a hand wave, we had to sit through the Clintons’ saxophone show first and then we…

ichbinjasokreativ,

TES III - V were all amazing. Can’t wait for TES VI to come out in 2035.

Semjaza,

You’re wrong, but I’m glad you have had fun and I hope that TESVI isn’t a micro transaction fuelled pile of tripe.

ichbinjasokreativ,

Their games are certainly getting dumber/simpler, I’ll give you that. Hope one of their future games will eventually live up to your standards again.

Klear,

You mean the game that shipped with a bug breaking the main questline?

Duamerthrax, (edited )

Terminator: Future Shock was also a janky mess. They’ve always released broken games and have some how survived this long.

Semjaza,

Yup, that’s the one.

Audacious,

I tried a bunch of Bethesda games in the past and didn’t like any of them. I known I’m in the minority when I say that.

vga, do games w Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset

How are there players?

echodot,

Sunk cost, they pre-ordered it, and they are darn well going to play it, even if they don’t enjoy doing so.

Don’t pull the video games especially when they’re digitally distributed. It’s not like they can run out.

Muscar,

Or they actually enjoy it. Just because you and others don’t doesn’t mean everyone doesn’t. I didn’t pay anything for it and thoroughly enjoyed it, and will do so more when the DLC comes out. As with anything there are valid points of criticism but so much of the hate for it is fully because of people’s idiocy and not anything else, I’ve never before seen so much deeply stupid criticism for something.

echodot,

I have no problem with people liking it. But I know for a fact that a lot of people really are just obsessed with it because they got bamboozled into pre-ordering, because Bethesda, and they don’t want to admit they made a mistake.

EnderMB,

Tribalism is surprisingly rampant in gaming, especially when a developer picks a side/is acquired by the creator of “their” console.

Duamerthrax,

People want to believe their lie.

TachyonTele,

It’s free on gamepass

Agrivar,

I’m sure a rational response is just going to get downvoted to oblivion, but it’s actually a fun game. Not my favorite from Bethesda, but I definitely enjoyed the 1k hours I put into it last year, and I look forward to dipping back in once the DLC drops and there are more mods (not paid creations) available.

vga,

Well no downvotes from me, that’s a valid opinion.

Krakaval,

You’re the actual proof that unpopular opinion does not result in downvotes to oblivion.

From now on : « remember that guy who said he LIKED Starfield… »

lemmyvore,

What do you do for 1k hours in Starfield?

bc93,

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • Agrivar,

    You nailed it. The ship-building, especially with the early mods that allowed more part rotation and clipping, REALLY sucked me in. I am excited to check out the enhancements BGS added to that system when I next play.

    bc93,

    deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • Agrivar,

    There was a mod that allowed you to (mostly) control door placement, but I’m not sure if it’s even still needed.

    Cowbee,
    @Cowbee@lemmy.ml avatar

    Base building, charting planets, roleplaying, bounty hunting, going to NG+, making different decisions in questlines, and more.

    The game is actually pretty good.

    dan1101,

    Starfield has a lot of good aspects, but also some bone-headed gameplay and content decisions. I had a lot of fun with it for a few weeks and will come back to it if/when it gets to a better state.

    MeanEYE, do games w Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset
    @MeanEYE@lemmy.world avatar

    Is repetitive buying of Bethesda games a new kind of litmus test for stupidity? I mean they do this shit constantly and people are still surprised when it happens. Did people really forget horse armor they tried to sell? Or forget about items that were free in Fallout 4, but had to be purchased in 76? It’s Bethesda and only one thing Todd dreams about is scamming another dollar from their fans.

    boonhet,

    Used to be that they’d sell you both worthless DLC and actually good DLC.

    Knights of the Nine?* Awesome. Horse Armor? Worthless.

    Similarly, Skyrim had Dawnguard and Dragonborn which were great. It also had Hearthfire which was kinda meh, but at least it had stuff to do and was cheap, so I’m not too mad about it.

    *There was also Shivering Isles, but at the time that was marketed as an expansion pack, not merely a DLC.

    Passerby6497, (edited )

    Pretty sure shivering isles was Morrowind and horse armor/ nights I’m the nine was oblivion. Those would have come out years apart.

    I don’t know what I’m talking about this early

    Rekorse,

    Thats not accurate at all. Shivering isles is oblivion and one of the best parts of the game.

    theonyltruemupf,

    I just buy Bethesda games years after release and have a blast playing them.

    MeanEYE,
    @MeanEYE@lemmy.world avatar

    If you find that worth it, then sure. Although that won’t be the case soon it seems as Todd has a hardon for live services.

    JimSamtanko, do games w Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset

    Bethesda has chosen to make their shit exclusive to a console that is outsold by its completion 2:1.

    They’re not exactly the bastions of good ideas.

    ExMimic,

    Microsoft owns Bethesda, so they probably didn’t have a choice

    JimSamtanko,

    They knew beforehand- and did it anyway:

    en.as.com/…/xbox-knew-from-the-start-that-every-b…

    ExMimic,

    The article clearly states Microsoft chose to keep it off Playstation, not Bethesda.

    JimSamtanko,

    And it’s well know that Microsoft knew they were going to do that before Bethesda sold off to Microsoft. So again, they’re not making good decisions.

    LunarLoony,
    @LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

    If you’re getting a big heap of money from Microsoft, who cares what decisions you make? (Playing devil’s advocate)

    Halosheep,

    What do you mean by this? I’ve played starfield on pc, is it exclusive to pc?

    JimSamtanko,

    Can you play it on a PS5? The console that I mentioned that is outselling the Xbox 2 to 1? And both FO and Elder Scrolls will be exclusive. Again, they’re not making good decisions over there.

    I didn’t mention PC. What I’m talking about isn’t about PC. It’s about consoles and their decision to side with Microsoft and lose money.

    Stovetop,

    Well, it’s not siding with Microsoft, it is Microsoft. This is a Microsoft game.

    JimSamtanko,

    Was it a hostile takeover?

    PoorlySketchedIdiot,

    No, Microsoft simply bought them.

    JimSamtanko,

    So like I said… they knew what was going to happen. And allowed it. So… big brain ideas happening over there.

    dylanTheDeveloper, do games w Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset
    @dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world avatar

    Is it good though

    BaskinRobbins, do games w Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset

    They’re selling a single quest as dlc? I mean if you going to do dlc then at least make a full expansion.

    NikkiDimes,

    Why waste time with lots of quest when few quest do trick

    JakJak98,

    Right?

    Bethesda just released an expansion for fallout 76. It’s a game that I’m fairly fond of, considering the amount of dislike I have for fallout 4, it improved on it in every way from the worldbuilding to building to the story, I could go on, point is, I like it.

    The new expansion, the first map expansion and like 20 major updates in.

    The new map is quite a large region. You’d expect a few side quests to unlock these other locations. Maybe some hidden gems. Maybe some cool NPCs outside of the main “expansion” right?

    Its literally: A main quest that’s short (beat it in like 3 hours on the first day it dropped)

    A single side quest that’s more of an optional objective on the main quest

    A single new event

    A single new boss.

    Four things they added. Two of which can only be done once (bad formula for a game designed around repeating similar tasks)

    They’ve just straight up gotten bad. There’s no love in their products anymore. It’s all taking the easiest way out, lacking any amount of real creativity.

    I just want them to migrate from their shitty proprietary engine, buckle down on a good story and prioritizing fun.

    ichbinjasokreativ,

    This is not a new thing, even back in 2012 the much-beloved borderlands 2 got five new missions which cost $2 each.

    JustAnotherRando,

    The thing with those is that, while it was a small amount of content, it wasn’t just a mission, each was about an hour of repeatable content that was fairly fun to farm. At $2, they actually still felt worth it with as much fun as B2 was. If they had asked for like $10 each, people would have flipped out.
    I’m not a Starfield player, but I would bet this is not even close to as good of a value proposition.

    Gladaed,

    Pretty sure it’s more of a pricing issue.

    Cybermonk_Taiji, do games w Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset

    There are Starfield players?

    RabbitMix, do games w Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset

    Honestly I don’t care, that’s a pretty reasonable price compared to the lot of the content sold for AAA games. This isn’t even noteworthy in 2024

    Kolanaki, do games w Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset
    !deleted6508 avatar

    It’s got more content than horse armor though. Totally worth it. ^/s^

    Emmy, do games w Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset

    It began with horse armour…

    the16bitgamer, do games w Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset
    @the16bitgamer@lemmy.world avatar

    $500 for a Krabby Patty?

    With cheese Mr. Squidward, with cheese.

    Adalast, do games w Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset

    Why are we surprised? They were the ones who pioneered the DLC microtrans model. I would legitimately have been more surprised if this headline were the converse statement.

    GeneralVincent,

    Hehe microtrans. That’s me

    altima_neo, do games w Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset
    @altima_neo@lemmy.zip avatar

    There’s people playing Strarfield to get upset in the first place?

  • Wszystkie
  • Subskrybowane
  • Moderowane
  • Ulubione
  • nauka
  • tech
  • giereczkowo
  • muzyka
  • Blogi
  • lieratura
  • sport
  • rowery
  • Spoleczenstwo
  • FromSilesiaToPolesia
  • test1
  • informasi
  • slask
  • Psychologia
  • ERP
  • fediversum
  • motoryzacja
  • Technologia
  • esport
  • krakow
  • antywykop
  • Cyfryzacja
  • Pozytywnie
  • zebynieucieklo
  • niusy
  • kino
  • LGBTQIAP
  • warnersteve
  • Wszystkie magazyny