lemmy.world

Dicska, do gaming w NES

In my language we just called it small Nintendo.

Evil_Shrubbery, do gaming w NES

9 10 dodo

ProfessorProteus, do gaming w NES
@ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world avatar

I thought my family were the only ones! Must have been to differentiate it from the “Super Nintendo” we also had.

Sorse, do gaming w NES
@Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

Dendy

ObsidianZed, do games w How did Call of Duty get to this point?

The gameplay has changed so little over the years but that’s because it’s unfortunately pretty solid.

I played a lot when I was younger but stopped because I didn’t have the money, hard drive space, or internet bandwidth to keep up with the new games and updates.

With that said, I actually jumped into this beta since it was included in Game Pass and it reminded me of CoD of my youth.

Will I every give them anymore more money? Nah.

Will I play it some more via Game Pass? Maybe.

My biggest complaint is the ecosystem is cancer. They have CoD HQ that acts as a launcher but can only handle a couple games and if you select to play one of the games it can’t play, it fully closes and launches the game you want to play.

Can you simply download and launch only the game you want to play? Nope.

This is all to get your eyes on as much of their content as possible to really squeeze out those last few dollars.

The amount of players I saw with the skins that cost them $100 minimum was crazy. These are very likely the same people that buy every game every year and are precisely the target demographic they’re marketing towards.

teft, do gaming w NES
@teft@lemmy.world avatar

Famicom

waigl,

2

odium, do games w How did Call of Duty get to this point?

unherd.com/…/is-call-of-duty-a-government-psyop/

It was never not evil. Just increasingly evil these days.

CaptainBasculin, do gaming w NES

In my country; all the retro consoles (up to playstation) are called atari.

Dark_Arc, do games w How did Call of Duty get to this point?
@Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg avatar

It’s not really beta quality. I hopped on with my brother just to see if I was interested in the game (we both played black ops, the original back on the PS3). It was actually extremely stable and pretty fun. He noticed a UI glitch but … it’s not like there was even a feedback or bug report button.

It’s just early access with the disclaimer there might be something wrong… Which isn’t that different from buying a release day game anymore unfortunately.

kitnaht, do gaming w NES

Where does “The original Nintendo” fall on this chart?

dual_sport_dork,
@dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world avatar

Somewhere off the bottom, shaped like a deck of playing cards.

frezik, do gaming w I've never seen a company squander as much goodwill as Blizzard.

Just wait until GabeN retires and the inheritors of Valve start to enshittify it. Unless GabeN had a good succession plan in place, or GoG can swoop in and become the new standard, things might get rough. I might stick to retro games from then on.

UndercoverUlrikHD,
@UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev avatar

Luckily BG3 is on GOG. I don’t think I’ve bought a new game on steam for years, granted I don’t play a lot of games nowadays.

Dave, (edited )
@Dave@lemmy.nz avatar

I bought BG3 on GOG simply because it was on GOG, otherwise I would have waited a few years. I want to support AAA games being release on GOG at release because it doesn’t happen much. GOG isn’t gonna take over Steam, because largely the industry isn’t going to support DRM free AAA games.

The_Picard_Maneuver,
@The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world avatar

I’m seriously concerned about this, yet I keep using steam because of the convenience.

CileTheSane,
@CileTheSane@lemmy.ca avatar

Steam is currently a good company so I am happy to support it. If it enshittifies then I will stop using it and sail the high seas if need be.

Warl0k3,

Steam is privately held, so there’s plenty of reason to be hopeful. The recent rapid enshittification of what feels like every company is mostly due to US laws that require publicly traded companies to squeeze every last dollar out or face severe penalties. Privately held companies are not subject to those laws, and so they can stay actually decent and care about their customers without threat of legal repercussions. An example is Lego Group - there’s some valid criticism, but legos have stayed a top quality product for nearing a hundred years - and show no signs of suddenly degrading in quality. So, I wouldn’t worry unduly about this until Valve announces an IPO. Then you should start worrying.

Crashumbc,

Just to be clear, there’s no actual law requiring that. It’s just an excuse they use to be greedy.

Warl0k3,

It’s more complicated than just one law that says “you must be a bastard” I admit, but fiduciary responsibility is a core requirement of any publicly traded company and very much is legally enforceable (this parenthetical aside stands in for about three pages of niche caveats and overly wordy exceptions that I’m just going to shamelessly handwave away). At best a CEO might be found to be civilly liable, but peasants non-C-suite employees are criminally charged for neglecting their fiduciary duty every day in the US.

Crashumbc,

Absolutely, but fiduciary responsibility, has never and was never intended to mean absolutely maximizing profits and especially at the long term expense.

That was a twisted idea that was put forward in the late 70s early 80s as a means to justify destroying companies for short term gain.

Warl0k3,

Oh, then yes I agree completely!

So anyways you coming to Steve’s “eat the rich” party? I hear he’s got a new barbecue.

Maggoty,

If you breach fiduciary duty the best thing you can hope for is to be fired. Executives have been criminally charged for it as well though. And while it has to be an intentional act of malfeasance, that gets pretty blurry when the shareholders hire thousand dollar an hour lawyers to come after you.

So while yes, the root cause is greed, the system itself is setup to feed that.

ivanafterall,
@ivanafterall@lemmy.world avatar

Ugh, the thought of some generic investment company swooping in and running Valve hurts my heart.

Kolanaki,
!deleted6508 avatar

My hope is that Gabe actually gets direct brain connection technology off the ground and he uploads his consciousness into an everlasting machine so he never has to retire.

pseudopsyche,

Perhaps one encased in a giant stone bust of himself. With lasers.

Flipper,

Why should they enshitify a service that is printing money with minimal effort? Right guys 🥲.

vrighter,

because they don’t understand why it’s printing money

thesporkeffect,

Not only do they not understand, they actively don’t care: they have a product-agnostic business process that can convert any type of stable business into a pile of extracted equity and spare parts. They are literally bleeding their own society to death

At least actual vampires would probably have the good sense not to destroy the breeding stock that keeps them alive.

fatalicus,

Because they could make it print even more money, and make the line go more up for a very short time!

That looks good on the CV you know.

ikidd,
@ikidd@lemmy.world avatar

Because most of these MBA fucks don’t understand the concept of piracy being a service problem. They have run perfectly fine systems into the ground because they insist on making it infinitely harder to use legit services than to just rip shit off.

Flipper,

Like the 28. Streaming service, so that I can’t find what I want anymore.

pressanykeynow,

Yeah, the thing about Steam is that buying your game at Steam feels better than downloading it for free somehow.

kiljoy,

Because it could be printing even MOAR money. Line must go up at all cost.

Rekorse,

Supposedly the answer is inflation. The same profit next year is worth less, so it needs to go up to be the same.

Of course thats not where most companies stop, is it.

kiljoy,

The thing that pisses me off if that my comp only goes up by 3% but that is failure to a corp.

Rekorse,

Thats interesting, I hadn’t connected those before. I think it would be hard to argue in favor of separate expectations for inflation of wages and the companies profits.

Like I understand having a stellar year, but the goal is still set the same, and its fine to return tk that baseline next year. Or maybe even doing well one year means we can lower the goal next year, or bank the difference for bad weather years.

Would be interesting if companies had an interest in the long term like that.

Jumi,

I don’t think he’s really that involved into Steam or Valve proceedings anymore

flashgnash,

Need someone to track videogame piracy rates and if steam gets enshittified make a graph and mark each of their bad decisions against it

gwen,

it’s a very closely held private company, gaben absolutely has someone to take his place with ideals similar to his.

Maggoty,

You hope. It wouldn’t be the first time.

gwen,

example? /genq

Maggoty,

Oh geez there’s so many people tend to write articles about the general phenomenon rather than specific examples.

One of the biggest recent examples though has got to be Boeing. While they’re a publicly traded company, they resisted the call of greed above all until they merged with McDonnell Douglas and the MD executives won the battle for control of the merged company. Things went on a decades long slide after that which resulted in hundreds of deaths and a chain of high profile mechanical failures we’re still not sure is over.

For privately held corporations it’s all about that new leadership. In fact around 70 percent of family run ones fail in the second generation. But any generation can run the business into the ground or change it up. Bancroft and Barings are great examples of that. Barings was 232 years old when it went bankrupt under mismanagement.

warm, do games w How did Call of Duty get to this point?

People buy it. People then buy the skins. I play the free to play one sometimes and nearly every single person I kill has a $30+ skin and weapons. It's saddening.

One of the funniest things with cod too now, is that people always used to say it was the same game every year, but it is actually the same game every year now, with progress and weapons carrying over.

Gone are the days of a one time purchase and a solid game. (Well in the AAA space anyway)

tacosanonymous, do games w How did Call of Duty get to this point?
@tacosanonymous@lemm.ee avatar

I haven’t looked into the beta itself. This particular ad seems to say you can use the exclusive items from the pack in the beta.

Edit: I just googled it. There is an early access beta but there is also an open beta.

But really the answer to “why is it like this?” Is “because money.”

Jackthelad, do games w How did Call of Duty get to this point?

To be fair, you don’t HAVE to buy it to access the beta as it’s open to everyone next weekend.

But yes, betas are now “glorified demos” and have been for a fair few years.

Blxter, do games w How did Call of Duty get to this point?
!deleted4407 avatar

Honestly the skins look better than the shit I saw in the last one like Niki Minaj and shit. I still wouldn’t buy any of them though.

Edit: as for paying for any kind of beta is dumb

  • Wszystkie
  • Subskrybowane
  • Moderowane
  • Ulubione
  • muzyka
  • esport
  • rowery
  • NomadOffgrid
  • informasi
  • Spoleczenstwo
  • krakow
  • test1
  • fediversum
  • Technologia
  • gurgaonproperty
  • shophiajons
  • Psychologia
  • FromSilesiaToPolesia
  • Gaming
  • slask
  • nauka
  • sport
  • niusy
  • antywykop
  • Blogi
  • lieratura
  • retro
  • motoryzacja
  • giereczkowo
  • MiddleEast
  • Pozytywnie
  • warnersteve
  • Wszystkie magazyny