I have hard time believing they had this great product they just didn’t want to support for a few years. Specially with how Sony has been dead set on having many live service games in its portfolio.
The flop of high profile titles like The Avengers showed that it’s no golden bullet.
Some gamers love a game they can play forever. Maybe others gamers dabble in it, but it’s time that becomes the limiting factor. I know people that every year buy CoD and FIFA and nothing else, and sure, they make unreasonable amounts of money, but there’s plenty more on the table to be had from gamers who don’t like that.
My biggest problem is that story doesn’t work if you do not sympathize with the funny muscle lady because the ending would be horrendous if you hate her, like I do.
Did you play it? If so, fair enough, but if not you’re missing out in my opinion. When it was announced i never believed i’d ever question whether a sequel could top the story told by the original, how could it? Playing through it a second time i do have that question now, it’s that good.
I had, I had a hard time with the conveniences in many of the cutscenes. The major problem for the story is that it really only works if you sympathize with Abby, if you don’t, then the ending just doesn’t… work.
If you spent 16 hours of gameplay with Abby and her story and her relationship with Lev and Owen and the rest of her friends and all you came away with is that she’s “the funny muscle lady”, then ya you did miss out on this game.
That’s nice and all, hey, do you remember that time that when Ellie pleaded with Abby not to kill Dina because she’s pregnant and then Abby responded with “good”?
Ya it was an intense scene! Why do you think Abby had that response? Because she’s a purely evil twisted character? or maybe because she was in a fit of rage after
spoilerlearning that Ellie had killed her pregnant friend Mel?
Are Ellie’s actions justified and Abby’s not? Why? I wasn’t trying to be mean by saying you missed out on this game, if you think Ellie’s actions are righteous and Abby’s are evil, you missed what the game was trying to tell you.
And you can get it next year on sale for $70 because fuck you you stupid consumer bitch that’s how it works here in Bethesda! Now go praise Starfield you fucking idiot!
I just meant that they made Skyrim once, found out that they can rerelease it ad infinitum, but were not able to reproduce this success with Starfield.
MW2 and MW3 were the first CoDs I played since Black Ops 2. I never appreciated just how good these games were. Feels a bit reminiscent of old school fast paced shooters, just… modern. And different.
Well, MW3 feels like it, while MW2 has a bad rhythm problem with the movement.
I usually play grandpa games. Rather play the Sims, Crusader Kings, Alan Wake, etc. I found it easy to do well in MW3. People mainly operate on reflexes so if you’ve been playing games for decades then you’ll also find it easy to do well, assuming you’ve been paying attention all these years.
Aside from the price, MW3 is a great entry. Worth checking out if you’re willing to expend a tiny morsel of effort.
No thats good for current business. They are forgoing long turn prospects and instead settling for milking an already drying cow. At least rock star make consistently enjoyable products, but even then without the promise of gta 6, gta5 would eventually dry up
The average consumer of games is a 12 year old with Mommy’s credit card
Though I seriously doubt you are correct in this assertion, I’m not sure how this attitude is helpful?
It’s like if someone said that the average person complaining about games online was just a loser living in their mom’s basement with too much time on their hands.
gameinformer.com
Najnowsze