bin.pol.social

Zoot, do gaming w Weekly “What are you playing” Thread || Week of May 5th
@Zoot@reddthat.com avatar

I’ve got an amazing group of online friends, and we’ve been doing a big mix of Content warning, DnD with rotating DM’s, and of course a shit load of helldivers!

GravityKat, do games w Dragon's Dogma 2: Review Thread
@GravityKat@lemmy.world avatar

SavisGame - 7.5 / 10

Dragon’s Dogma 2 succeeded in taking the principles of the series to an advanced stage of creativity, but it suffered from an imbalance between the elements of exploration and the way the missions were presented, in addition to some problems with the plot. savisgame.com/13664/dragons-dogma-2-review/

AceFuzzLord, do gaming w Am I the only person that feels that retro games are better?

Depends on the game. As great as retro games are, I could never give up newer indie titles like Baba Is You or Brok The Investigator, which would be much shorter games or have other problems if they were made for consoles pre-internet games download days.

Though I will say that retro games like Sonic 1 & 2 on Genesis or Ratchet and Clank on PS2 are pretty much infinitely better than the triple AAA slop they’re throwing at us today.

Especially when we have companies (like sweet baby inc.) forcing characters to be changed to Mary Sue’s all because we need inclusivity. I have no problems with inclusivity at all, but I have a major problem with poorly written characters in games that have absolutely nothing going for them besides being perfect.

toothpicks, do gaming w Am I the only person that feels that retro games are better?

100% . I only play PS1 games

sleepybisexual,

Any recommendations? I mainly play 16 bit Nintendo systems. Would like to play a ps1 game that isn’t a street fighter game

toothpicks,

Depend what you like I guess. Crash Bandicoot? Tomb Raider? Gran Turismo 2? Medievil? Abe’s Odyssey! What am I forgetting?

sleepybisexual,

I’m open to genre, but don’t like multidisc stuff

toothpicks,

I don’t know much multidisc stuff outside of Heart of Darkness which I remember being pretty good!

Alabaster_Mango, do gaming w Weekly “What are you playing” Thread || Week of May 5th
@Alabaster_Mango@lemmy.ca avatar

I’m playing the ninja platformer N++. I’m probably not good enough to 100% it, but I’m having a blast with it.

LoamImprovement, do gaming w Am I the only person that feels that retro games are better?

I mean, let’s not forget that the early consoles had their own pitfalls, a period of gaming that spawned tropes like ‘Nintendo Hard’ and ‘Guide Dang It’ in order to, among other things, pad out the length of what we would consider an otherwise barebones game, and to sell time on their hints and tips hotline. I do feel like there was less bullshit in the past, but it definitely still existed.

d3Xt3r, do gaming w Am I the only person that feels that retro games are better?

I’m with you. In fact I’ll say even retro operating systems were better (no bloat, no spyware, easy to understand/configure/mod/hack around), as well as retro Internet (no Javascript crap, no browser fingerprinting/tracking, simpler HTML, super easy webdev) and retro computing (no soldered-on components, PCs were more modular and easy to repair)… heck, planet earth in general was better back then. We’ve been on a downwards spiral since the 2000s. Everything sucks now.

Blisterexe, do gaming w Am I the only person that feels that retro games are better?

just out of curiosity, what device is that?

doctorzeromd, do games w Recommendations for Pacific Northwest Themed Games?

Life is Strange (1 and True Colors are the best in the series IMO)

Sunny,

I just checked my library and actually seem to have grabbed these for a free a while back, so will be installing these the next few weeks :)

doctorzeromd,

I’d start with 1, they’re not chronological but I think it was the best in the series. True Colors is second.

Sunny,

Ill do that then, thanks :)

Turmbaumeister, do gaming w Why do mobile games suck nowadays?

Have they ever been good? The sad thing I can tell you as a mobile dev(not game though) is that people on Android don’t want to pay for apps or games, on iOS it’s a bit better but still way worse than PC or PlayStation. There’s also rampant piracy on Android, both from users but even more so from shady app clones Google ignores. As a result free to play, always online with microtransactions is basically the only way to make money

zeitschlag, do gaming w Weekly “What are you playing” Thread || Week of May 5th
@zeitschlag@discover.deltanauten.de avatar

As I have plenty of time due to reasons, I decided to continue Red Dead Redemption 2 after not having played it for a year or so. Damn, that thing just looks great.

any1th3r3, do gaming w Weekly “What are you playing” Thread || Week of May 5th

Cyberpunk 2077. I just finished Act 2 last night and I’m (probably) about to begin Phantom Liberty.
Really enjoying most of the story and side quests so far!

luciole, do gaming w Am I the only person that feels that retro games are better?
@luciole@beehaw.org avatar

Just be careful not to idealize the past as some golden age of gaming. During the SNES era, worthwhile titles were few and far between on top of spotty regional availability on account of profitability (supposedly). The bar to entry for gamedevs was huge: the dev tools were obtuse and the distribution methods were shit and centralized (toy stores, computer stores, magazines). The offer was also ridiculously sanitized, at least on consoles.

It’s great that we can still enjoy the good games of the past, but I absolutely love what indies come up with nowadays. There are so many and they’re so creative! ❤️ Some talented big studio devs even manage to release something nice once in a while despite the organizational structure they work in. I never want to go back to gaming in the 90’s. Furthermore, I’m of the opinion that there are many past titles being hailed as classics solely based on some unconscious nostalgia for youth (I’m looking at you GOG).

bonegakrejg,

Its just like with idealizing music eras. People remember the stand outs and forget the bad and mediocre stuff so it seems like everything was better in whatever time.

reboot6675, do games w The PlayStation 2

Me and my friends used to play a lot this shooter game called Time Splitters. It had some wacky characters and crazy guns. Good memories

timo_timboo_,

Man, TimeSplitters 2 is the goat. Still play it every now and then. Some levels weren’t that great, but the characters, multiplayer aspect and just the overall “goofyness” of the game really make it stand out

millie, (edited ) do gaming w Am I the only person that feels that retro games are better?

There definitely is a lot of crap that came out back in the day that we tend to forget, but there were also very different popular strategies for game making.

One of the most significant for me is the degradation of choice in RPGs. Many, certainly not all, of the RPGs I played as a kid and as a teenager would have elements of their story that could diverge to some degree based on your actions. The most typical results were things like a different ending or an otherwise hidden scene. Silent Hill was a good example of this. But you’d also have a lot of games where your choices immediately and totally altered the way things play out, like Planescape: Torment or Baldur’s Gate. Your choices could affect not only the ending, but a whole lot on the way. Hell, the first Fallout game served up some major unforeseen consequences for an action that on the surface seems like a pretty straightforwardly good idea.

But ever since Mass Effect I’ve noticed an emptiness in choice making, and recently I saw an article that showed me why.

If you follow the branching choices in those early games like a flow chart, the choices on it were often significant divergences that don’t ever meet back up with the original iteration of the quest. But modern design techniques try to be efficient, so you’ve got a branching point at the point of choice, then it rejoins the main quest, and then later on it branches off briefly to check what you did and react to it, before going back to the main quest as though nothing happened.

It’s such a letdown. If you only play once and never save scum it’ll seem fine, but the lack of depth becomes readily apparent so quickly. It’s not like nobody’s still doing big branches too, but you can tell when they default to this and it feels so empty.

I’ve enjoyed Baldur’s Gate 3, but one of the things I notice, especially in act 3, is how slapped together some of these branching choices are. Also, as cute as the die rolling mechanic is, the constant clear and random success/failure state of all branching choices just leads to endless save scumming. The game doesn’t handle it like a divergence in one way or the other, it straight up tells you you failed.

In D&D the die rolls are fun and tense, but they don’t become this totally separate gambling subgame. Sometimes it’s important to get a bad die roll, and sometimes the result in terms of fun is way better than getting a good die roll. I never got that impression from BG3. It felt like a bad die roll meant missing content rather than getting different content, and I think that’s largely because of the literal framing of the die rolling UI and the associated sounds. A more neutral UI where you don’t know the DC of what you’re rolling for and it doesn’t scream at you that your roll wasn’t good enough might let people RP out the failure a little better. Comedy doesn’t hurt either, and is a great tool for DMs seeking to alleviate some of the pain of a bad roll.

Anyway, point being, I think there are some problems with modern game design philosophy that stem from seeking efficiency and greater visual fidelity and audio complexity over engaging game design. Shitty graphics and limited processing power mean you have to make decisions to bring the player into the world and get them to forget that their character’s head is like 8 pixels or whatever. So they have to exploit humanity’s adeptness at pattern recognition, but they also have to make what they’ve got count. They’re not overloading it with bloat and random branches just for the hell of it. A branching story was a branching story because they really wanted it to be.

I’m probably like 50% talking out of my ass, but I feel like if we had Tim Cain here with us he’d agree with me.

Though indie games do seem perfectly capable of avoiding this corporate optimization shit.

But in a word: no.

You are not.

  • Wszystkie
  • Subskrybowane
  • Moderowane
  • Ulubione
  • muzyka
  • nauka
  • sport
  • giereczkowo
  • Blogi
  • rowery
  • Spoleczenstwo
  • lieratura
  • antywykop
  • Psychologia
  • fediversum
  • motoryzacja
  • FromSilesiaToPolesia
  • Technologia
  • test1
  • Cyfryzacja
  • tech
  • Pozytywnie
  • zebynieucieklo
  • krakow
  • niusy
  • esport
  • slask
  • kino
  • LGBTQIAP
  • opowiadania
  • turystyka
  • MiddleEast
  • Wszystkie magazyny