space.com

SamsonSeinfelder, do astronomy w NASA loses contact with Ingenuity Mars helicopter

71 successful flights on a different planet is a very impressive achievement non the less

tate,

And much more impressive than what they intended in the first place!

SpeedLimit55, do astronomy w Big, doomed satellite seen from space as it tumbles towards a fiery reentry on Feb. 21 (photos)

Satellite or Tie Fighter?

Sequentialsilence, do astronomy w NASA loses contact with Ingenuity Mars helicopter

So basically 72 flights into it’s 5 flight mission it went to far over the horizon and lost line of sight. So they have to drive over to it to re-establish communication.

  1. They’ve done good already, they don’t need to go this hard.
  2. They went so hard they went over the horizon and lost coms.
  3. Because it’s autonomous it’s likely still operational, they just have to get close to it.
danekrae, do astronomy w Water found on the surface of an asteroid for the 1st time ever

If there were something or someone depending on that water, Nestlé would be right there, wiping every drop away, and then sell it back.

MachineFab812,

I love you. Keep doing the gods own work.

Grass, do astronomy w Powerful X-class solar flare slams Earth, triggering radio blackout over the Pacific Ocean

Fucking enough “slams” in headlines!!!¹¹11one. /s

troyunrau, do astronomy w What would happen if you moved at the speed of light?
@troyunrau@lemmy.ca avatar

Aside from the fact that anything with mass cannot travel at the speed of light… Lots of fun things happen as you approach the speed of light. There’s an excellent mostly-hard sci fi novel called Tau Zero that explores this concept in depth and, despite being older, is worth the read.

(1) Time dilation (the universe and you have different clocks).

(2) blueshifting of objects in front of you. At 0.95c, basically all visible starlight in front of you has been blueshifted into ionizing radiation. Fun fun.

(3) shape distortion. You become more needle-shaped – getting very long and skinny, as observed by the rest of the universe.

(4) you become a nuke. At .99c if you run into anything, your kinetic energy related explosion would be roughly 6x the Tsar Bomba (largest nuke ever detonated) for each kg of mass. Or, put another way, each kg of your mass would impact with the energy of 3kg of antimatter contacting 3kg of matter. Boom.

Sci fi always overlooks the last one. Near light speed combat is basically firing buckets of sand at planets and blowing them up.

karmiclychee,

Speaking of sci fi, Kim Stanley Robinson’s 2312 does a really good job of incorporating the existential dread and lurking horror of weaponized orbital mechanics.

troyunrau,
@troyunrau@lemmy.ca avatar

Right! And that’s not even one percent of lightspeed.

Shadow, do astronomy w What would happen if you moved at the speed of light?
@Shadow@lemmy.ca avatar

Lizard babies, obviously.

teft,
@teft@lemmy.world avatar

Warp 10 is much much faster than light. Warp 1 is the speed of light. Warp 10 is the speed of light times infinity which is considered “transwarp”.

acockworkorange,

Ackchuyally…

Potatisen, do astronomy w Big, doomed satellite seen from space as it tumbles towards a fiery reentry on Feb. 21 (photos)

That’s not a satellite, that’s the Empire coming for us!

Sendpicsofsandwiches,
@Sendpicsofsandwiches@sh.itjust.works avatar

THEY’RE STRIKING BACK!

givesomefucks, do astronomy w Powerful X-class solar flare slams Earth, triggering radio blackout over the Pacific Ocean

The abundance of back-to-back solar events has led scientists to think the sun may have entered its explosive era of peak activity, known as solar maximum — which seems to be starting a year earlier than previous forecasts predicted. However, researchers will have to wait until the sun “calms down” to know for sure.

What we do know is that X-class flares are most common during solar maximum, which is part of the sun’s 11-year solar cycle. So far in 2024, seven X-class flares, including the latest one, have burst from the sun, which is already half the number that reached Earth in 2023, Live Science previously reported.

On a long enough timescale, we’re gonna be hit by a big one.

I remember like a decade ago they were saying it hits a developed area, it’ll blow out all the transformers, and on that scale no country could replace them all for a very long time.

Australis13,

I agree. There were articles and documentaries about 20 years ago that I remember featuring these sort of events. The continent affected would take 20-30 years to rebuild its electricity grid.

givesomefucks,

I’ll just never get over how “we” (science I guess) know that stuff like this isn’t a question of if, but when.

And we just don’t seem to get ready for it.

Like, Y2K we saw coming and everyone handled it in time. But if there’s no firm date on something, everyone with the power to do anything just ignores it.

As a society it just feels like we’re living paycheck to paycheck. Can’t worry about next year cuz rents due in two weeks shit.

It’s just not a good way to go about things.

Australis13,

In general, people are appallingly bad at weighing up long-term vs short-term stuff, both in terms of risks and benefits. It's even worse when, as you say, there's no definite deadline or it doesn't directly affect those who can do something about it.

Rolder,

“No electricity” definitely sounds like an “everyone” problem lol

deafboy,
@deafboy@lemmy.world avatar

If it’s an EVERYONE problem, clearly SOMBODY is doing something, so I can safely ignore it. /s

slazer2au,

What you didn’t see was the guy who made the problem in the 60s warn everyone about it from the 70s onward until his retirement in the 90s, then everyone say oh shit, he is right.

sploosh,
givesomefucks,

Yes, we get hit by them all the time…

What everyone else is talking about is a big one.

sploosh,

The Carrington event was a big one. It is estimated to have been an X40 flare. This article is about an X1.1 flare. Telegraph poles caught fire. The auroras were so bright people woke up and started making breakfast even though it was the middle of the night. They were visible as far south as central Mexico! If we got hit by a Carrington scale flare today we would be repairing the power grid for the next half century.

Rolder,

I believe it’s possible to avoid if the proper protocols are in place. Namely, the grid has to be turned off completely before the flare hits and then things will mostly be fine. Just wonder how well we can predict these events.

Australis13,

My understanding is that we actually don't have much of a warning (under an hour), since a CME has to reach the satellite at the Lagrange point between Earth and the Sun for us to know it's about to hit Earth. According to the article below, this includes power companies, but I remain skeptical that there's enough organisation in place to shut down the North American, European or Asian grids in 15 minutes.

https://www.space.com/coronal-mass-ejections-cme

padjakkels, do astronomy w The sun's magnetic field is about to flip. Here's what to expect.
@padjakkels@lemmy.world avatar

That title is click bait

Maultasche, do astronomy w A baby star's planet-forming disk has 3 times more water than all of Earth's oceans

Nestlé is already building a rocket.

umbrella, do astronomy w 3 tiny new moons found around Uranus and Neptune — and one is exceptionally tiny
@umbrella@lemmy.ml avatar

at one point we have to realize theres an infinite number of small rocks orbiting any given planet

maniacalmanicmania,
@maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone avatar

Why you gotta be so mean to my itty bitty moon brothers and sisters?

Spaghetti_Hitchens,

The itty bitty satellite committee

elmicha,

Does Earth also have such small orbiting rocks that are a few kilometers wide?

Bumblefumble,

No, we only have one moon. I think the gravity of the moon is too large for other moons to be in a stable orbit around Earth.

NoIWontPickaName, do astronomy w 3 tiny new moons found around Uranus and Neptune — and one is exceptionally tiny

They really need to change the name to Urectum to end the jokes about how to pronounce it

Lucidlethargy,

Agreed, but knowing scientists that’ll probably take at least 596 years to achieve.

banghida,

Tbh no other language but English has the same problem. In some languages it is simply ‘Uran’, and it does not mean anything but Uran.

TotalFat,

Urasshole

Jakdracula, do astronomy w NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab laying off 8% of its workforce
@Jakdracula@lemmy.world avatar

Ugh. Less money for important things, more money for war!

BakedCatboy, do astronomy w For this dead star, 72 years is a single Earth day

Had to read the article to find out that they mean 72 “years worth of orbits” happen in 1 earth day. Although unlikely I was hoping that it was orbiting so fast that 1 earth day there would pass 72 earth years to a stationary observer due to time dilation. Not sure how fast it would need to go for that to happen.

XeroxCool,

Since time and speed are relative, to have 1 Earth day on the star and see 72 years on Earth, it’d simply be a speed multiplier of 72*365.24= 26,296.28 times faster. Our solar system orbits the galactic center at 250km/s or 0.0008c, so ~26k times that puts it at nearly 22c relative to us. So no.

But quite frankly, there must be a way to be a slower observer. Earth’s orbital speed is about 30km/s (0.0001c) so that drops the product way down to 2.6c. And while the Parker Solar Probe holds the record for the fastest man made object at 0.0006c at its closest solar approach, it actually took a lot of energy to slow it down to get it to the sun and stall it’s orbit. Otherwise, it’d just orbit it the same as the Earth. It slides out to a Venusian distance from the sun at apogee and drops to 12km/s, halving the differential requirement to +1.2c. But if everything is relative, how do we even determine where 1c is and know it’s so definitively impossible to reach? I don’t know, I’m starting to have an existential crisis. Maybe time just keeps dilating and simple addition/subtraction doesn’t apply for appreciable values of c so you have to start multiplying in decimals.

BakedCatboy,

Relativistic time dilation is nonlinear, so the time dilation “multiplier” approaches infinity as you approach the speed of light. So you will never need more than 1c to pass any finite amount of time for the observer while only passing a smaller amount of time for the moving object. Using a time dilation calculator, it looks like 1 day inside the moving object to 72 years for the stationary observer works out to roughly 99.9999999% the speed of light (9 nines total). Of course if you take into account earths movement as a “stationary” baseline then it’ll depend on whether you’re moving with or against the fast moving object.

It used to melt my brain too but there’s no need to know “absolutely stationary” since you’re comparing 2 objects. And due to the time dilation, the 1c limit is different depending on the observer, the time dilation will prevent anyone from observing >1c even if one person is going 0.9c relative to another person who is also going 0.9c relative to a stationary observer.

  • Wszystkie
  • Subskrybowane
  • Moderowane
  • Ulubione
  • giereczkowo
  • Blogi
  • rowery
  • Pozytywnie
  • tech
  • Spoleczenstwo
  • niusy
  • sport
  • lieratura
  • esport
  • Cyfryzacja
  • kino
  • muzyka
  • LGBTQIAP
  • opowiadania
  • slask
  • Psychologia
  • motoryzacja
  • turystyka
  • MiddleEast
  • krakow
  • fediversum
  • zebynieucieklo
  • test1
  • Archiwum
  • FromSilesiaToPolesia
  • NomadOffgrid
  • m0biTech
  • Wszystkie magazyny