Ubisoft’s bread and butter were never assassin’s creed type hardcore games, but those trashy looking pet sims you could find in the bargain bin. The only reason they’re able to make the hardcore gamerz stuff is because of the financial security the shitty pet games brought in
Jest to określenie wieloznaczne, ponieważ może odnosić się do grup dyskusyjnych realizowanych poprzez maile (np. GNU Mailman), do mailowego marketingu, lub do newsletterów.
Kontekst historyczny jest taki, iż oryginalnie grupy dyskusyjne były obsługiwane przez protokół NNTP ( www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3977 ) – z których najbardziej znanym i uniwersalnym wdrożeniem był/jest Usenet ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet ) – rozsądny, zdecentralizowany protokół, także z edycją (supersede) i wycofywaniem (cancel) postów. Wymaga dedykowanego klienta, np. slrn lub Pan. Listy mailingowe były natomiast rozsyłane e-mailem. Google stworzyło interfejs webowy do Usenetu oraz własnych grup a`la forum http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Wavel zwało się “grupy [dyskusyjne]”. Oba podejścia nie są bardzo efektywne zasobowo, gdyż typowo klienty cytują cały post/mail na który się odpowiada, choćbyśmy odnosiłx się do jednej linijki tekstu. Z m.in. tego powodu Google zaczęło pracować nad “reinvent the wheel” – protokołem/ekosystemem Google Wave, uogólnieniem ponad listami/grupami/forami i chatami ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Wave ).
Tutaj rys historyczny Usenetu (i też Internetu w Bolandzie) – dla Wolnościowcx gorzkie, gdyż pokazuje, iż nie można po prostu udostępnić szerokiej społeczności jakiegoś forum: pixelpost.pl/wzlot-i-upadek-usenetu-oraz-historia… .
Jeśli możesz, podziel się namiarami na grupę lub grupy.
Z mojego doświadczenia wynika że bywa z tym bardzo różnie. Niektórzy na przykład trzymają się ortodoksyjnych założeń, że powinno się ująć niezbędny kontekst w odpowiedzi, inni zakładają że klient pocztowy uzupełni kontekst wiążąc wiadomości w wątki. Odpowiedzi nad i pod cytatem - to jak wybór między Emacs i vi. 🤭
As a game studio - a developer rather than a publisher - it’s very much hand to mouth. You are paid by the publishers on delivery of milestones. Milestone reviews can sometimes be subjective. You’re basically the lowest link in the food chain and can be subject to a publisher’s whim, which can often be a bit random depending on your external producer. Keeping such a studio open in the long term is about chasing new contacts, and any gaps between contacts is expensive because you aren’t generating any income, but are having to pay wages. One or two project cancellations can easily shutter an independent developer.
In some cases studio owners may simply want out, or they might legitimately see a sale as bringing stability to the studio… Or it might just be greed. But I think it’s hard to say whether a studio would have a safer long term future being independent or being sold.
Making game is extremely risky gamble. Sometime studio can spend years working on one game and it might result in subpar sales due to element that’s not in their control, like Spec Ops: The Line. Take Obsidian Entertainment for example, over the year we kept hearing how they’re financially struggling despite created some of the best RPG, and Microsoft acquisition suppose to free them from this issue to some degree. Same with Tango Gameswork. Zenimax and to some extend Mojang is different case though.
Lot of game studio open and close, if Tango doesn’t sold to Bethesda and in turn to Microsoft, it might already closed. Though on the flip side it also mean they’re at the mercy of their parent company, it still undeniable that Microsoft is the one killed them in this case.
Because a lot of studios, like for example Double Fine, sold because they couldnt pay the checks anymore, its stupid trying to blame the studios or people that sold the studios, the blame is not on them.
What are you missing without it? If you don’t missing anything, I wouldn’t bother. The Nitro Deck seems to add back buttons for example, but they’ll probably be limited to simple button mappings, nothing fancy like you could do with Steam Input for example.
Xbox Series X controller with added ExtremeRate back paddle kit.
For PC games:
og Steam controller
Most of the time I use the Dualsense Edge though, because I rarely use controller on pc and almost never turn on my Xbox.
I play most of my 2d games on purpose built retro handhelds, so there’s no real separate controller to speak of, but I do love pretty much all of them in different ways.
I really wanted to like the OG steam controller but the touchpad-joystick-analogue makes it basically impossible to play any of the games I’d want a controller for. It’s a great controller for using on things that aren’t really intended for controller. Want to play an FPS leaning back in your chair? It’s great for that. Want to play Hades? I’m gonna pass and plug in my dualshock instead.
I actually revisited it recently and gave it a second shot after getting used to the steam deck pads, but unfortunately it’s still not really doing it for me personally.
bin.pol.social
Najstarsze