arstechnica.com

gamer, do gaming w The Sims re-release shows what’s wrong with big publishers and single-player games

EA should split itself up or sell off some franchises. The current situation makes nobody happy: investors don’t like the profitability of single player games, players don’t like the live serviceification of single player games, and I’m sure devs don’t like that they can’t work on projects that likely inspired them to become game devs in the first place.

The Sims franchise could support a medium sized studio on its own.

I played the Sims 1&2 as a kid, and love the fuck out of them. As an adult with disposable income, I would have gladly dropped even $100 on a proper modernized rerelease of these games I love. Instead, I saved my money and downloaded them for free. Because why the hell wouldn’t I? The pirate versions are literally better. EA is squandering the potential of this and many other IPs

clarinet_estimator,

RIP maxis. May you one day be reborn. 😔

LassCalibur, do gaming w The Sims re-release shows what’s wrong with big publishers and single-player games

The old version of The Sims works just fine for me with the widescreen patcher and doesn’t require any app store or online account.

lambalicious, do gaming w The Sims re-release shows what’s wrong with big publishers and single-player games

basic platform features

like cloud saves or achievements

cloud saves

considered “basic”

on a single-player offline game

Ooooh boy, the antiintellectual effects of tiktok reach deep.

Duke_Nukem_1990,

Explain in one sentence what cloud saves are and how they conflict with it being a singleplayer offline game.

gamer,

BaCk iN mY DaY wE SaVeD To FlOpPy DiSkS!!

etc

lambalicious,

Hey! Someone else remembers floppy disks!

lightnsfw,

I remember the floppy disks that were actually floppy. I don’t think I ever saved to one though.

lambalicious,

Never said they conflict. Said they’re not a “basic feature”. Sigleplayer has lived without cloud saves since around 1960.

Heck, most modern consoles have a USB port, I’d consider “offline save” more “basic” than “cloud save”. After all we all know by now the corporate internet can’t be trusted.

SomethingBurger,

Electricity isn’t a “basic necessity”. Humanity survived for thousands of years without it.

Cloud saves are a basic feature of any modern game. It’s extremely easy to add on Steam without even having to implement it in the game. It’s just configuration, so not having access to the original source code isn’t an issue.

tal, (edited )
@tal@lemmy.today avatar

Yeah, I was going to say, of all the things one might complain about…a lack of cloud saves and achievements?

I get “needs more testing before re-release”, but come on.

qyron, (edited ) do gaming w The Sims re-release shows what’s wrong with big publishers and single-player games

Can someone explain me what are the cloud saves for and achievements?

What is the point of gamifying a game?

barsoap,

Cloud saves are for playing on more than one box as well as backup. Achievements, from the developer’s POV, give some insight into player behaviour, you can also drop hints there (I would never have tried to pet the manta in Satisfactory otherwise), make suggestions for tasks people can set themselves, etc. Whether you, as a player, cares honestly nobody but you gives a fuck.

I can tell you, for example, just from the achievement statistics, that a metric fuckton, an absolute majority, of Cities:Skylines players play modded. They do track city building milestones and very very few people are reaching anything even close to mid-game with achievements still enabled.

qyron,

Thank you for the insight. I respect it but nonetheless those are features completely indiferen to me.

webghost0101, do gaming w The Sims re-release shows what’s wrong with big publishers and single-player games

Archive it before EA finds it. Probably works better than the rerelease.

github.com/voicemxil/TS2-Starter-Pack

scrubbles,
!deleted6348 avatar

Archived. Of course they have no legal reason to take it down, but I’m sure that won’t stop them.

Megaman_EXE,

Looks like EA found it already. Damn.

I hate when companies rerelease games in a worse state than the originals.

I was just thinking about going and finding the originals, but of course, the new rerelease is the only thing available to purchase. Is the “athletic lady” site the still the go to place? I have not gone sailing in quite some time

Hobbes, do astronomy w Don’t panic, but an asteroid has a 1.9% chance of hitting Earth in 2032

Is there any way to get it here sooner?

tonytins, do gaming w The Sims re-release shows what’s wrong with big publishers and single-player games
@tonytins@pawb.social avatar

Not surprised that it’s as bad as when they first re-released The Sims 2.

Dimok, do gaming w The Sims re-release shows what’s wrong with big publishers and single-player games

It’s exactly what I would expect from EA. They haven’t got a cent from me in years.

theangriestbird,

As long as FC and Ultimate Team keep being reliable money factories, you can expect them to continue half-assing everything else.

Nilz,

Everything else? That’s implying FC and Ultimate Team aren’t being half-assed.

B0rax,

I expected there would be more „pay to win“ now.

DragonTypeWyvern, do astronomy w Don’t panic, but an asteroid has a 1.9% chance of hitting Earth in 2032

Fucking finally goddamn

Megaman_EXE, do gaming w VGHF opens free online access to 1,500 classic game mags, 30K historic files

This is so cool!

uxia, do astronomy w Don’t panic, but an asteroid has a 1.9% chance of hitting Earth in 2032

Reading this headline instantly brought a huge smile to my face 😁

FreakinSteve, do astronomy w Don’t panic, but an asteroid has a 1.9% chance of hitting Earth in 2032

Can we speed that up a bit?

llamacoffee, do astronomy w Don’t panic, but an asteroid has a 1.9% chance of hitting Earth in 2032
@llamacoffee@lemmy.world avatar

Wow this is the most depressing comment section I’ve ever seen.

threelonmusketeers,

Yeah, even for Lemmy this is bad. I hope most of them are semi-facetious?

Swedneck,
@Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

it’s just standard “haha self harm funi”, it’s so easy to post and reliably gets a few upvotes, so it’s just a kneejerk response to posts like these.

AbsoluteChicagoDog, do astronomy w Don’t panic, but an asteroid has a 1.9% chance of hitting Earth in 2032

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • Xavienth,

    Sarcasm?

    Idk about you but if it levels 1287 km² of forest, I don’t think that would exactly be good news for a populated area. On the upper range, it could be equivalent to a 40 megatonne bomb.

    threelonmusketeers,

    Provided it enters in a similarly uninhabited location.

    Majorllama, do astronomy w Don’t panic, but an asteroid has a 1.9% chance of hitting Earth in 2032
    @Majorllama@lemmy.world avatar

    Which direction do I need to fart to up those numbers?

  • Wszystkie
  • Subskrybowane
  • Moderowane
  • Ulubione
  • test1
  • rowery
  • Technologia
  • krakow
  • muzyka
  • shophiajons
  • NomadOffgrid
  • esport
  • informasi
  • FromSilesiaToPolesia
  • fediversum
  • retro
  • ERP
  • Travel
  • Spoleczenstwo
  • gurgaonproperty
  • Psychologia
  • Gaming
  • slask
  • nauka
  • sport
  • niusy
  • antywykop
  • Blogi
  • lieratura
  • motoryzacja
  • giereczkowo
  • warnersteve
  • Wszystkie magazyny