space.com

kalkulat, do astronomy w What would happen if you moved at the speed of light?
@kalkulat@lemmy.world avatar

‘Speed of light’ compared to what? is what you need to worry about. Most things in the universe won’t be moving at the speed of light compared to you (or whatever you’re inside of), and when you run into them, you won’t last for long.

Kata1yst,
@Kata1yst@kbin.social avatar

That's the neat part of the speed of light. It's the speed of light for every reference frame, no matter who is looking at you or from where.

kalkulat,
@kalkulat@lemmy.world avatar

If you’re zooming past the Earth at the speed of light headed straight at the Moon, you’ve got about 1 second to enjoy that before you make a very, VERY large crater.

If you change course and head straight at a frozen tardigrade, it will make a VERY large crater in you.

Kata1yst,
@Kata1yst@kbin.social avatar

To actually reach the speed of light you'd be massless, so the only damage, would be from momentum transfer, at which point your particles would be reflected or absorbed like light.

But that aside, mostly I was referring to your statement:

'Speed of Light' compared to what?

Which is really not a concern. It's the speed of light for everyone with respect to everything, or it isn't the speed of light. Like, two beams of light going in opposite directions don't see the other light beam going at 2x the speed of light, just at the speed of light with lots of time dialation.

kalkulat,
@kalkulat@lemmy.world avatar

You already knew the answer to ‘What would happen if you moved at the speed of light’ was was “To actually reach the speed of light you’d be massless.” No shit. The question was already massless.

troyunrau, do astronomy w What would happen if you moved at the speed of light?
@troyunrau@lemmy.ca avatar

Aside from the fact that anything with mass cannot travel at the speed of light… Lots of fun things happen as you approach the speed of light. There’s an excellent mostly-hard sci fi novel called Tau Zero that explores this concept in depth and, despite being older, is worth the read.

(1) Time dilation (the universe and you have different clocks).

(2) blueshifting of objects in front of you. At 0.95c, basically all visible starlight in front of you has been blueshifted into ionizing radiation. Fun fun.

(3) shape distortion. You become more needle-shaped – getting very long and skinny, as observed by the rest of the universe.

(4) you become a nuke. At .99c if you run into anything, your kinetic energy related explosion would be roughly 6x the Tsar Bomba (largest nuke ever detonated) for each kg of mass. Or, put another way, each kg of your mass would impact with the energy of 3kg of antimatter contacting 3kg of matter. Boom.

Sci fi always overlooks the last one. Near light speed combat is basically firing buckets of sand at planets and blowing them up.

karmiclychee,

Speaking of sci fi, Kim Stanley Robinson’s 2312 does a really good job of incorporating the existential dread and lurking horror of weaponized orbital mechanics.

troyunrau,
@troyunrau@lemmy.ca avatar

Right! And that’s not even one percent of lightspeed.

atx_aquarian, do astronomy w What would happen if you moved at the speed of light?
@atx_aquarian@lemmy.world avatar

The time thing is interesting, but I feel like no one talks much about the appearance of passing objects. That is, I wonder how the image of a passing celestial object might distort due to length contraction and any other effects. I’m still trying to understand that. This article seems pretty digestible, so far.

Shadow, do astronomy w What would happen if you moved at the speed of light?
@Shadow@lemmy.ca avatar

Lizard babies, obviously.

teft,
@teft@lemmy.world avatar

Warp 10 is much much faster than light. Warp 1 is the speed of light. Warp 10 is the speed of light times infinity which is considered “transwarp”.

acockworkorange,

Ackchuyally…

FabledAepitaph, do astronomy w Solar eclipse on Mars! Perseverance rover sees Martian moon Phobos cross the sun in epic video

The Stranger o.o

LostXOR, do astronomy w Solar eclipse on Mars! Perseverance rover sees Martian moon Phobos cross the sun in epic video

I remember another video of this from a while back, really cool!

Cap, do astronomy w Solar eclipse on Mars! Perseverance rover sees Martian moon Phobos cross the sun in epic video
@Cap@kbin.social avatar

I love this line, "...is an asteroid-sized moon orbiting a few thousand miles (or kilometers) above the Martian surface..." A few thousand miles...or kilometers, we don't care, pick your favorite.

Solemn,

A quick search says Phobos orbits 3700 miles, aka 6000km, above the surface of Mars. A few thousand of either is in fact, correct.

dave,
@dave@feddit.uk avatar

If you’re imprecise enough, anything is about half the size of an adult giraffe.

Peppycito,

Which half? The neck half or the leg half?

dave,
@dave@feddit.uk avatar

No, silly, the left half.

Peppycito,

The half that’s left. Got it.

jeena, do astronomy w Solar eclipse on Mars! Perseverance rover sees Martian moon Phobos cross the sun in epic video
@jeena@jemmy.jeena.net avatar

This is very cool!

threelonmusketeers, do astronomy w Nuclear power on the moon: NASA wraps up 1st phase of ambitious reactor project

Seems better suited for !space or !NASA. Cool project though.

Jakdracula, do astronomy w NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab laying off 8% of its workforce
@Jakdracula@lemmy.world avatar

Ugh. Less money for important things, more money for war!

cyberpunk007, do astronomy w ISS astronaut controls Bert the dog-like robot on Earth during simulated Mars mission

They say he can explore small caves, but wouldn’t this little guy be solar charged and they could lose him if he doesn’t have enough juice to get back to the surface?

crazyminner, do astronomy w ISS astronaut controls Bert the dog-like robot on Earth during simulated Mars mission

What the hell is the blue thing going on in the background. That thing looks way cooler.

Sequentialsilence, do astronomy w NASA loses contact with Ingenuity Mars helicopter

So basically 72 flights into it’s 5 flight mission it went to far over the horizon and lost line of sight. So they have to drive over to it to re-establish communication.

  1. They’ve done good already, they don’t need to go this hard.
  2. They went so hard they went over the horizon and lost coms.
  3. Because it’s autonomous it’s likely still operational, they just have to get close to it.
SamsonSeinfelder, do astronomy w NASA loses contact with Ingenuity Mars helicopter

71 successful flights on a different planet is a very impressive achievement non the less

tate,
@tate@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

And much more impressive than what they intended in the first place!

MrCookieRespect, do astronomy w NASA loses contact with Ingenuity Mars helicopter

:(

  • Wszystkie
  • Subskrybowane
  • Moderowane
  • Ulubione
  • test1
  • muzyka
  • Spoleczenstwo
  • giereczkowo
  • rowery
  • slask
  • Psychologia
  • ERP
  • lieratura
  • fediversum
  • motoryzacja
  • Technologia
  • esport
  • tech
  • nauka
  • Blogi
  • krakow
  • sport
  • antywykop
  • FromSilesiaToPolesia
  • Cyfryzacja
  • Pozytywnie
  • zebynieucieklo
  • niusy
  • kino
  • LGBTQIAP
  • opowiadania
  • warnersteve
  • Wszystkie magazyny