SchmidtGenetics

@SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world

Profil ze zdalnego serwera może być niekompletny. Zobacz więcej na oryginalnej instancji.

SchmidtGenetics,

The story/lore is from reading all the item descriptions and talking to everyone, gotta find it yourself unlike most games.

SchmidtGenetics,

I agree, those are those play for the gameplay games, I don’t want to sit in a menu for 20 hours reading lore and still don’t know that I’m missing the necklace that explains why the jesters head was cut off or some stupid shit.

These games are made for some passionate fan to explain the lore in a way for others to grasp and that’s not always a bad thing. Still friggen stupid though.

SchmidtGenetics,

People already seem to forget this isn’t the first time, the release of Witcher 3 was horrendous as well.

SchmidtGenetics,

It being released in a essentially a beta state with a terrible UI? half the loot being a bitch to access because you always cast igni? Game breaking bugs and glitch’s? Hard crashes?

I don’t think they have released one game that was actually release ready yet.

CP2077 was far worse, but that doesn’t mean the Witcher 3 was okay, it was still absolutely botched.

SchmidtGenetics,

I had the quest glitch where you could no longer progress the story. It was also in the later 25% of the game, so 80ish hours in.

SchmidtGenetics,

Sounds more like downplaying the severity of one.

SchmidtGenetics,

It’s more like both are tornados and one is an F3 and the other being an F5. You’re being disingenuous in defending CDPR for continually inexcusable work.

An industry standard bad? What’s that even mean? At that point in time games were shipping complete still and not in a beta state.

Its always hilarious the excuses people come up with, neither are excusable, yet here you are justifying one… yeesh, give your head a shake.

SchmidtGenetics,

I didn’t know a a progress breaking bug at 80 hours in is annoying…? That falls in the latter, non-functional. What about not being able to pick up loot? That’s non-functional…. You’re excusing shitty devs lmfao, this isn’t about good or bad, this is all shades of shit, or like I said previously tornadoes.

Sounds like you just aren’t educated on what the issues actually were, rose coloured glasses or something…. So not only disingenuous now.

SchmidtGenetics,

They devs say the knew of the requirement from Sony and it was also part of the store requirement since it was listed, so why would they list it for sale in those countries? It seems Steam should have some limitation in place on their end, and the Dev picks sales on Steam, not the publisher.

Theres shit to go to everyone here, not just Sony in this case. And no one seems to want to accept personal responsibility for not reading the game requirements and ignoring the splash screen when you first loaded the game. Everyone who bought and missed all the warning flags should also take a look back at themselves before complaining about something that was always going to be required and was at the very start at launch.

SchmidtGenetics,

Every single one of those reviews missed multiple warnings about the required account linking.

They are false reviews by definition, the store had the requirements listed, and there was a splash screen you had to accept when loading the game.

Every single one of those reviews is someone who made an uneducated purchase, they shouldn’t be defended for their willful ignorance.

SchmidtGenetics,

I wonder if it’s more damage control, why are they allowing games to be sold in markets where the mandatory linking wasn’t possible?

Steam should know this limitations, the devs knew about the requirements from Sony, it was listed on the store page since it was listed.

SchmidtGenetics,

Communicate better? Not sell the game in markets where it wouldn’t work. The limitation was something from the get go.

SchmidtGenetics, (edited )

You’re absolutely correct, how many of those reviews are pointing the blame correctly? I haven’t seen a single one yelling at Steam or arrowhead for selling the game in these markets that wouldn’t be able to play the game.

SchmidtGenetics, (edited )

Arrowhead also knowingly sold a game in markets where it wouldn’t be possible to play the game, even at launch with the restrictions in place you could buy the game in these markets. Steam also allowed these games to be sold in markets where they knew the restrictions wouldn’t allow them to play the game.

They fucked up and are now trying to deflect blame from themselves, yeah Sony is shitty, but arrowhead and steam both saw dollar bills and tried taking them.

Edit, if anything, Sony can turn this around that Arrowhead and Steam strong armed their way out of the contract requirements. Steam and arrowhead should take the fall and costs in this one if that’s the case.

SchmidtGenetics,

Steam just limited the purchase to right markets today, so yes they are.

SchmidtGenetics,

That arrowhead and steam sold a game in markets that the game was restricted? Just go to the steam page I guess.

Steam also just today restricted the sales to the correct markets, they always had the capability it seems.

SchmidtGenetics,

Steam and arrowhead both allowed the sale of the game in non-compatible markets.

Everyone is to blame in, it all depends on how you want to swing it.

I’m not defending any single entity, I literally blamed them all lmfao.

But of course someone is a shill when they go against your bias and narrative…. Give your head a fucking shake.

Sony ripped you off here, so did Steam and so did arrowhead. Arrowhead is kind of being the worst here throwing everyone else under the bus instead of owning up to their mistake and sever lack of communication though. They are trying a strong arm tactic now that they got caught with their own hand in the jar.

SchmidtGenetics,

Arrowhead didn’t know that only certain regions of the world can make PSN accounts

Ignorance? Really?

It would go without saying that they would be informed of returns, so after the first return of the game in one of those markets that defense would no longer be valid.

Arrowhead has no excuse for not educating themselves before agreeing to a contract, and for continuing to sell it after obviously knowing about the issue for months.

SchmidtGenetics,

Why would they knowingly sell a game in 20 countries that would just refund it 10 minutes after first launching it?

Because the refunds stopped after the first day as you said, why would they stop a cash flow coming in knowing it would now no longer be refunded anymore?

And yes of course steam passes that information along, why would you claim they don’t?

SchmidtGenetics,

Steam article May answer that question

SchmidtGenetics,

Why are you blaming Sony for Arrowheads greed here? Sony sucks, but it’s arrowhead and steam in this case.

SchmidtGenetics,

Why are we defending publishers and letting them get away with using this term this way? The term should be earned for its content and quality. AAA should not mean “large studio”.

This whole “we are a AAA studio”, when they haven’t even made a game and got the business license the day before is fucking stupid as shit. Don’t use the terms the way they want it to be used.

SchmidtGenetics, (edited )

What are you talking about…? What other industry uses it that way? Every other industry is quality, not size. Don’t let them get away with this shit.

Don’t defend them and let them get away with this shit.

If you continue to use this incorrect term, it will become a thing, that’s what they are hedging on, people like you letting this happen. AAA means quality, they aren’t putting out quality product so they are trying to change what the term means so they look good. Way to eat that shit right up.

SchmidtGenetics, (edited )

What other industry uses the term that way? Every other industry is quality. AAA to refer to size…. Right….

I know that’s how the term is used, it’s just fucking wrong when every other industry uses it differently……

Don’t let them get away with this shit. You are defending them. Notice how your link even says informal……… they are trying to make it a thing, when no other industry uses that way, and other people in the industry are calling it out.

You’re trying to defend this stupid shit.

If you continue to use this incorrect term, it will become a thing, that’s what they are hedging on, people like you letting this happen. AAA means quality, they aren’t putting out quality product so they are trying to change what the term means so they look good. Way to eat that shit right up.

SchmidtGenetics,

The AAA games they used to put out were quality games at one point. So the term was correct, now that the quality has slid they are trying to get marketing to work on their side.

And people like you letting them get away with it is how it works.

I think this is where people usually say shill and boot licker in these exchanges.

SchmidtGenetics,

Way to explain your point with anything of substance dude….

You’re the reason why marketing works so well. Say something flashy and people will find a way to defend it and support them. Even if it’s nothing to do with anything.

SchmidtGenetics,

So nothing but a troll defending corporations using terms how they want…? Okay. Keep using the term the way they want so it means literally nothing anymore! You are the problem, glad you made it obvious! Thanks!

SchmidtGenetics,

And that’s how marketing wins, when everyone just rolls over and accepts it.

Nah, this is just part of a long list of shit the rest of the gaming industry is trying to reverse, stop letting this continue to happen and stop defending it.

SchmidtGenetics,

I think the issue is Mario being used with guns and other stuff, it’s detrimental to their image.

SchmidtGenetics,

Think of how stupid the average person is, now realize that half the world is under that line.

SchmidtGenetics, (edited )

Nintendo game out hot at the start when people were referring to other consoles as “Nintendos” even though they weren’t NES’ or SNES’. Theres plenty of precedence already then why they had to stop that immediately.

SchmidtGenetics, (edited )

What’s your areas testing and graduation rates….? Average IQ? I know that’s not the best metric, but we need something here.

Because that sounds like a wonderful fairytale place to live.

This is done, because this a very common issue with people… you seriously want to bury your head in the sand on this one….?

SchmidtGenetics, (edited )

The problem stems from the subtle ways in which language develops. It’s instinctive for us to pluralise product names in everyday conversation (Oreos, Jet Skis) or turn them into verbs (to photoshop, to tarmac). But by doing so we begin to erode the trademark. Companies can, from the outset, encourage us to use an alternative generic name; sometimes this works (Nintendo pushing the term “games console”), sometimes it almost works (Xerox’s fondness for the term “photocopying”), and sometimes it fails miserably (who has ever referred to the once-trademarked trampoline as a “rebound tumbler”?)

Nintendo had to start calling their stuff “game consoles” so their name wouldn’t be genericized to refer to all consoles. Its not always about sueing others. Theres lots of avenues they need to protect and they knew they needed to defend it from the start.

SchmidtGenetics,
SchmidtGenetics,

Hosting the roms was the illegal part, when they stopped there was no legal basis for Nintendo to pursue them anymore.

SchmidtGenetics,

You said they are intelligent, so what are you basing that off of than? The only real tangible thing is IQ, so yes it is a fine metric in that case.

You’re in sciences it seems, so you would be around people with supposedly higher intelligence, but at the same time… damn can they be dumb, mislabeling chemicals, thinking if they drive with the top down they can’t get sunburn since the rays can’t hit them…. Yeah smart people are dumb too, some barely pass while other fly. So there is a large discrepancy right there. Yet you are clumping them all into the same “intelligent” category.

Thats obviously extremely disingenuous, but you’re not going to see this are you?

SchmidtGenetics,

So… what other options are there? And why are you not bringing them up to defend your point when asked?

You realize you’re making a fool of yourself and people in your field, yeah? You’re giving off a “I’m smart, why aren’t you” attitude, and that explains everything about your view.

So you going to defend and address any points? Or are you just gonna flout that you think you’re intelligent when you’re probably below the line and why you think everything is a okay….

SchmidtGenetics,

Uhh… that is exactly why marketing works dude….

SchmidtGenetics,

Doesn’t need to be as powerful and the battery lasts way longer.

Theres obviously downsides like needing a connection, but it’s meant to fit a different role than the steam deck.

SchmidtGenetics,

Get a group of friends and drink while doing it?

Nothing interesting happens at a mall, pub, but people still enjoy those solo with friends.

SchmidtGenetics,

Their lawyers tie you up with a lot of legal fees trying to get you to defend it, if you don’t they take you to court for a frivolous suit.

Either way they win and you lose, even if you’re right.

I don’t see it playing out positive unfortunately.

SchmidtGenetics,

Sounds like it, not a lawyer, but if you’re wasting peoples time and money, yeah there will most likely be a way for them to get back at you.

SchmidtGenetics,

But the rub is, under fair use you can’t profit from it though, so as soon as you accept payment, now they can sue you. So in the end, they win and get it for free regardless.

SchmidtGenetics,

But how can they make a contract? Signing it would violate fair use exemption before that could be argued.

Corps are abusing a conflict within the laws, it’s not even a loophole, it’s just the unfortunate way the laws that protect each person/industry don’t agree.

SchmidtGenetics,

Can’t quit on a heater and no one wants to leave on a loss.

Elden Ring is getting a free-to-play mobile version with in-app purchases (www.rockpapershotgun.com)

Action-RPG colossus Elden Ring is reportedly getting a free-to-play mobile adaptation with in-app purchases, which takes inspiration from miHoYo’s Genshin Impact. It’s being published by Tencent, who apparently acquired the licensing rights to Elden Ring back in 2022 and put a few dozen people to work on a prototype, even as...

SchmidtGenetics,

Why did you assume they are young?

Servers cost money, adding content costs money, if you want something for free, who’s paying these costs? Because if it’s the business, they won’t be in business very long if they just spend money and have nothing coming back in.

I say this as a person in their 30s, age is irrelevant here.

SchmidtGenetics,

The key difference being you paid for the game…. This is a free game… totally different scenarios. So yes I will downvote you for completely missing the point of the discussion and ranting on about something totally irrelevant.

How does a company keep paying for servers and content when they don’t charge for the game or anything else….? With proper MTXs….

SchmidtGenetics,

It’s another unrelated market, mobile games can’t charge $80 for a game. People don’t even like paying $10. That style of developing is barely affordable nowadays as well for pc/console anyways, but that’s another argument and not relevant to this one.

You are comparing apples to oranges. And there’s nothing predatory when it’s done correctly, but there’s also some people who just see the devil in everything, lien you apparently.

  • Wszystkie
  • Subskrybowane
  • Moderowane
  • Ulubione
  • rowery
  • giereczkowo
  • lieratura
  • Blogi
  • test1
  • muzyka
  • Spoleczenstwo
  • slask
  • Psychologia
  • ERP
  • fediversum
  • motoryzacja
  • Technologia
  • esport
  • tech
  • nauka
  • krakow
  • sport
  • antywykop
  • FromSilesiaToPolesia
  • Cyfryzacja
  • Pozytywnie
  • zebynieucieklo
  • niusy
  • kino
  • LGBTQIAP
  • opowiadania
  • warnersteve
  • Wszystkie magazyny