Hey, if it would make them support rail transport to the max I would be all for them naming it whatever they want, but I somehow suspect that that’s not the case here.
That’s actually kind of a brilliant concept that should serve as an example for other video game publishers then: open-source the program so that it can be maintained by the community, but require a license to use the artwork. The community could eventually recreate and even improve the artwork anyway.
If you don’t retain some kind of actual ownership, they will not be allowed to use terms like “buy” or “purchase” on the store page button. I hope there aren’t huge holes in this that allow bad actors to get around it, but I certainly loathe the fact that there’s no real way to buy a movie or TV show digitally. Not...
Not trying to argue, but I don’t believe I can re-sell my copy of a game I “bought” on GOG, so in my view that’s not full ownership as most people understand it. If you’re a full, legal owner of some property, you can sell that property anywhere you like.
Rep. Steube Introduces Make Autorail Great Again Act to Rebrand DC Metrorail as WMAGA and Trump Train (steube.house.gov) angielski
After parting ways with EA, WRC gets new home and six-year deal to "reboot" rally series (www.eurogamer.net) angielski
EA has open sourced a bunch of old Command & Conquer games (github.com) angielski
I’m not well versed in C&C, but it’s always good to see more games open sourced.
what's a game that has you like:
https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/dc419ad3-cd38-4c07-8e10-777650515d61.jpeg
California’s new law forces digital stores to admit you’re just licensing content, not buying it (www.theverge.com) angielski
If you don’t retain some kind of actual ownership, they will not be allowed to use terms like “buy” or “purchase” on the store page button. I hope there aren’t huge holes in this that allow bad actors to get around it, but I certainly loathe the fact that there’s no real way to buy a movie or TV show digitally. Not...