@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Ulrich

@Ulrich@feddit.org

Profil ze zdalnego serwera może być niekompletny. Zobacz więcej na oryginalnej instancji.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Fosscord changed to “spacebar” a while back. If you want a more Discord-like experience, try the Cinny or Comet Matrix client. And on mobile the SchildiNext Chat client. Although I really can’t recommend Matrix as a replacement at all.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Matrix authentication process is confusing and annoying. If your friends aren’t technical, they’re going to have a bad time.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Uhhhh I’m not sure, I only use the text functions

Ulrich, (edited )
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Sure, but Steam can leverage their already-massive 132M userbase, just like Epic has (only much bigger). Put an announcement on the Steam store and client pages. Show a pop-up when someone opens the website from an Android device, etc. I mean certainly they wouldn’t achieve the same level of success as Google who has their store installed on literally every Android device, but even a tiny fraction of their revenue would be an enormous boon to Steam.

So if Steam starts to distribute games for Android, the Steam app would be thrown out from Google Play.

That’s not how that works. They only throw it out if you use the app in the app store to distribute other apps. They don’t ban the entire company from distributing any software.

Ulrich, (edited )
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Valve is in the business of selling PC games.

They support games for Windows, Mac and Linux. And I’m sure they would support them for PS, Nintendo and Xbox if they weren’t created with explicit intention of not allowing that sort of thing. Android is the only market they could feasibly enter and choose not to.

Moving into a new market wouldn’t be trivial

No but it also wouldn’t be that difficult for a company with Valve’s resources, and would be extremely lucrative.

Google has put up a lot of barriers to make it especially difficult for a third-party app store to challenge their monopoly.

Such as?

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Why would you think that?

For the reason I mentioned in the OP. Because it’s been done before, several times. Including by Epic, with a fraction of Valve’s resources.

Amazon and Epic have both tried to launch their own Android storefronts

Everything I’ve read about the Amazon store indicates that it sucks on every level, for all parties.

The Epic Store is only a few months old. And they can’t even make a decent or profitable app for PC so I’d be very unsurprised if their mobile app is also trash.

Ulrich, (edited )
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

That’s like saying Amazon has a “barrier” to online sales because they refuse to allow Target to sell products on their site for free. They’re competing services, why would they allow that?

I’d wager the majority of Android users have never downloaded an application other than from the Google Play Store.

Developers most often distribute software outside of official repos in Windows and MacOS, and they do so successfully.

It’s not that hard, you just follow the prompts on the screen.

Ulrich, (edited )
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Epic has not failed (yet). As I just said, it’s only been around for a few months.

I disagree about Amazon for reasons I’ve already stated so we’ll have to agree to disagree on that.

Ulrich, (edited )
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

What would you suggest they sell on their Android store that users would be so encouraged to install a new store and then what they want?

…games?

Steam already has a store on Android

Uhhhh they have an Android app which you can use to buy and manage PC games. That’s not what I’m talking about.

because most games on steam either already exist on the native google play store

…no? Even if they did you’d have to buy 2 licenses instead of 1. As I mentioned in the OP.

Most mobiles unlike a arm laptop, have no x86/amd64 emulator

I’m not suggesting emulation or translation (although that would be great as well), I’m suggesting an app store for selling and installing native Android games.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

The average user already uses Windows and/or MacOS, and I would argue those installation procedures are far more complicated.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Yes, I am aware. Which is why I continued my explanation after that.

Ulrich, (edited )
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

I’m not rejecting anything. It’s called a discussion. They could very well be right. I just disagree.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

We’re not talking about installing an operating system. I’m not suggesting Steam create their own OS (although they’re also doing that). We’re talking about installing an app.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

I think that’s the more likely scenario. They plan to transition their hardware to ARM processors.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

I just explained this in the comment you replied to.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Aside from the fact that Steam Link is pretty terrible and requires a high-speed local connection, native Android games.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

No, they would have to create and distribute their own app store, just like Epic.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

And hows that working out for epic?

I don’t know, it’s only been around for a few months.

Valves strategy of not doing anything new in the last decade

That’s not their strategy. I mean, among other things you may have heard of this thing called the Steam Deck? Or Family Sharing? SteamOS? Shit there’s a new video every week about Steam Client updates and improvements.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

If they start allowing users to install android games, Google is going to stop them from having anything useful in their play store app.

They would have to distribute it independently. Google would have no say in the matter.

what would Steam do if they started getting android-only games being submitted. Or mobile-quality games dominating their store?

…cash their checks? I don’t understand the question. That’s the point.

it might be something they’ve discussed but they would have rather focused on steam deck-type gaming for mobile.

perhaps an ARM-based steam OS+steamdeck approach would make more sense

…why not both?

Although Valve seems to like staying in their lane so that seems like the most likely explanation.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

You said it’s easier than installing Windows

No I didn’t. What I said was:

We’re talking about installing an app.

I’m saying it’s easier to sideload apps on Android than it is on Windows and MacOS, where it is the primary distribution method used by average people every day.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

That’s exactly my point. The current app lets you buy PC games despite being distributed through the store.

And they could continue doing so while also distributing a separate app independently that allows you to buy Android games.

Notice if you try to buy a movie from Amazon on Google TV they redirect you to the website. They could do the same or redirect you to the non-Google version.

I’m just saying I think there are reasons they haven’t done it (yet?)

I agree, I just find it very curious what those reasons are.

Ulrich, (edited )
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

I’ve installed them all. FDroid, Obtainium, Aurora, Accrescent, along with a slew of other sideloaded independent apps, on several devices. That’s not how it works.

If you sideload an app, a pop-up will ask if you want to enable the current app to install the new app and give the typical warning about malware that you’ll get on any OS (for good reason). You click the pop-up, it redirects you to the proper location in the settings app, you toggle the switch and…that’s it.

The instructions are right here on Epic’s website

Instead you have to open the file browser and find it in your downloads folder, then you can install it from there.

Yes that’s how it works on Windows and Mac as well.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

I didn’t realize that but it doesn’t change the fact that:

  • The PC draws way more power than is needed
  • The PC must be powered on (mine draws ~40 watts at idle)
  • A monitor has to be plugged in and turned on.
  • The aspect ratio on the devices have to match or you’ll get letterboxing.
  • If your main display is 4k it will run the game at 4k even if you’re playing on a 720p display so you have to go in and change the graphical settings every time you switch devices.
  • In my limited experience it literally just doesn’t even work at all.
  • Even if you’re running over the web you’re limited to the strength of your data connection.

It just doesn’t work like it should, in my opinion. Hopefully they can fix this in the future with Steam Machines.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

I don’t think they would get away with selling games in the app if games were playable on Android

I’m saying they would need a separate app to purchase, install and play Android games.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

…because a phone fits in your pocket? And it already goes everywhere with you?

Even if you think it’s dumb (which I mostly agree with) Apple alone makes more money from mobile gaming than every other gaming platform combined.

Ulrich, (edited )
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

more work and risk then its worth.

It’s worth billions.

theyd have to convince people to essentially break androids walled garden

It’s not anymore a “walled garden” than Windows.

Then there is the fact that phones are different specs, more testing

There are billions of potential PC configurations. Android would be extremely easy by comparison.

valve would gain little

Did I mention billions? 💵

i think not mucking around in an already monopolistic mobile market is a pretty wise business decision on their part overall.

You could be right.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Well there is that but there’s also the example I gave in the OP where devs could potentially extend their existing games into a new market, increasing their potential audience. A single license would gain a new platform with potential sales opportunities.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Now that I’m thinking about it they’d probably have to de-list those cross-platform games from the Google app or make them unavailable, which would probably lead to a lot of confusion.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Valve didn’t expand Steam into Linux to gain market share in a new market

…I didn’t say anything about Linux?

there isn’t a successful second app store that isn’t tied to hardware

That doesn’t mean there couldn’t be.

even Amazon quit Android

Well everything I’ve read about Amazon indicates that it was atrocious for everyone so that’s unsurprising.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Bro why are you being so argumentative?

What are you talking about? Do you expect me to just reply to everyone who provides a response “Yes, you’re correct” and move on? Am I not allowed to participate in the discussion I started?

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

I don’t understand what that has to do with the discussion.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

I’m sorry you feel that way, I don’t know what to do about that.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

…would you like to explain?

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

They can do whatever, it’s their store.

No. They can’t.

which…lets Google ban anyone they want from the Google Play store

No it didn’t.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Seems to work just fine for me and all of my 3rd party apps and stores 🤷

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

It’s called diversity. It has its drawbacks but for the most part it works just fine. That’s why it’s the most popular mobile OS in the world.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

It can also be delivered with said advertising company completely removed from the system. Because it’s open source.

Did you notice how the alternative wasn’t even involved in this discussion? Why do you think that is?

Ulrich, (edited )
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

I’m very familiar with the case.

and the only reason for it to become a case, was the monopolistic position.

The reason it became a case is because Epic violated the ToS (intentionally).

That’s gone now, they’re free to refuse service to whoever they want, whenever they want, for no reason at all…

…what is gone, exactly? You think this settlement suddenly made them no longer a monopoly? That’s not how that works. Further, companies that are not monopolies ALSO have to comply with their own ToS, so I’m honestly very confused about what you’re trying to say here.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Because steam already is on windows and linux?

Really? You’re really going to pretend Windows and Linux are alternatives to Android? Can we just have an honest conversation, please?

It took a legislative fight with the eu and quite a few fines before they decided to stop being ass much of a bunch of assholes.

You’re mistaken. They’re still a bunch of assholes. If you specifically live in the EU you might be able to distribute your own apps but they still require Apple’s rubber stamp and Apple still gets to collect the vast majority of their tax. Not the case for Android (anywhere). And it’s been this way from the beginning.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

loaded with spyware, ads, and shitty monetization practices

I mean that’s already the case with PC games…? Only slightly better because they are not Google and don’t allow straight-up ads for third-party products and services, which is what most of these “free” mobile games run on anyway. Valve has the potential to make a much better experience.

If you don’t like it, don’t buy it.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Excellent, so you agree it’s not the problem you made it out to be?

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

It wasn’t my argument, it was yours.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

You’re also assuming that buying a game on PC steam will also give you a license to play that game on android, which isn’t a given.

It wasn’t an assumption it was hypothetical.

BDS calls for boycott of Microsoft and Xbox gaming products over alleged Israeli military connections (www.rockpapershotgun.com) angielski

The international Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement are calling on people to cancel Game Pass subscriptions, avoid Microsoft-owned video game properties such as Minecraft and Call Of Duty, and boycott all Microsoft Gaming and Xbox-branded products in protest at the company’s reported business connections with the...

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Been boycotting them for 24 years…

The only XBOX product I’ve ever bought is controllers.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

a fromsoft exclusive.

Really!? Man I wouldn’t have expected that but they seem to be going downhill fast.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

I tried to make a Blizzard account recently, just for testing purposes. Literally could not do it. Spent half an hour trying to complete weird math quizzes, at the end of which it would just fail. Gave up.

Ulrich,
@Ulrich@feddit.org avatar

Framework is upgradeable. The S76 isn’t.

  • Wszystkie
  • Subskrybowane
  • Moderowane
  • Ulubione
  • test1
  • rowery
  • Technologia
  • krakow
  • muzyka
  • shophiajons
  • NomadOffgrid
  • esport
  • informasi
  • FromSilesiaToPolesia
  • fediversum
  • retro
  • ERP
  • Travel
  • Spoleczenstwo
  • gurgaonproperty
  • Psychologia
  • Gaming
  • slask
  • nauka
  • sport
  • niusy
  • antywykop
  • Blogi
  • lieratura
  • motoryzacja
  • giereczkowo
  • warnersteve
  • Wszystkie magazyny