Goronmon

Goronmon, 7 miesięcy temu

In this case, OP is stating that he thinks no company should be making games with any type of sexual content. Just in case his kids want to play that game.

That goes beyond "monitoring what their kids play" and that's why people are reacting strongly.

Goronmon, 7 miesięcy temu

Not everyone is a coomer who wants to revolve their life around sexuality.

You can acknowledge that sex exists without someone's life revolving around it. Just like "wanting sex to be private" may not mean that someone is just terrified of the topic itself or thinks all sex is gross and should be avoided.

Just because people have different values than you doesn’t make it sad.

Some values become more of a target for criticism than others. "No one should make content that I don't personally approve of" is one that I would categorize as worthy of criticism.

Goronmon, 7 miesięcy temu

OP stated that only porn games should have any sexual content in them because his kids play video games.

She people aren't kids should see sexual content, but that's it's weird to be against any kind of sexual content but not be bothered by violence.

Goronmon, 7 miesięcy temu

So, your opinion is that any and all violent content is never a concern, and is appropriate for any age, even small children?

I have to say, that is not an opinion I've seen too often.

Goronmon, 7 miesięcy temu

You stated that they are different, that sex is something serious and concerning, and that worrying about violence is something boomers do.

If you didn't mean it to come of that way then I'm not sure why you worded it that way.

Goronmon, 7 miesięcy temu

Source available is open source. There’s a recent movement trying to redefine open source to refer only to FOSS, but it’s pretty stupid.

You have it reversed. The "source available is open source" argument is the more recent idea. Unless by "recent" you mean "in the last 30 years".