By consistently contributing to the sub only 'to save people a click' rather than contributing interesting Links of your own, I find you in violation of rules one and three.
No one disagrees that internet news articles can do better in terms of quality and content. However by only contributing what you dislike as opposed to contributing what you do like, you're coming across as entitled and disrespectful to the spirit of the community.
I give you two hours to find and post a scifi article or item for us to talk about or face a one week ban.
However by only contributing what you dislike as opposed to contributing what you do like, you’re coming across as entitled and disrespectful to the spirit of the community.
This is an odd perspective. They’re literally contributing by fixing what they dislike and preventing others from having to waste time. They don’t come across as entitled. They come across as helpful and respecting the time and attention spans of the community.
Ok, are we not seeing the at that title is both hyperbolic and click-bait? If it was an in depth, thoughtful article, it’d be a different thing. Is anyone surprised a for profit company is not spent g capital on a streaming program over movies, which are inarguably more profitable.
This seems a rather impressively outsized a reaction for a common push back against click-bait articles thing.
Dodaj komentarz