I’m hesitant to say that the current word is a bad choice, but it feels far too specific to me. I’m curious what questions one could ask after finding out that it’s a type of f___ that would lead to the exact type of f___ that it is.
Again, I’m hesitant to criticize the decision, because it’s entirely possible that I’m just dumb and gave up too soon
Agreed. I narrowed it down to a small species of ocean fish that was featured in Finding Nemo, but couldn’t figure out how to pin down a specific species.
My Questionsis it alive? 👍 is it an animal? 👍 is it a land animal? 👎 is it a salt water fish? 👍 is it a tropical fish? 👍 is it commonly consumed in America? 👎 is it a common fish in home aquariums? 👎 is it a common fish in public aquariums? 👍 does it have a distinct color? 🤷♂️ is it larger than a bread box? 👎 is it a keystone species? 🤷♂️ is it a character in the movie Finding Nemo? 👍 Is it larger than one foot in length? 👎 does it have unique characteristics that differentiate it from other fish? 👍 is it a clown fish? 👎 is it an angler fish? 👎 is it a deep sea fish? 👎 is it a seahorse? ⭐
I feel the same way to be honest, with the current question I did it all the way through and I was at odds end of what I could ask it aside from just straight out asking if it’s a specific type, third question in was the exact one that you spoilered out and yet I wasn’t even able to get a general ballpark of what it was in the next 17 questions.
Is it an object? 👍 is it something found in a house? 👍 is it an appliance? 👍 Is it a kitchen appliance? 👍 is it a toaster? 👎 Does it heat food? 👍 is it a microwave?
Thanks for finding this issue. Our “cheater buster” was a bit overzealous about the first question, but it’s a legitimate non-cheating question so we’ve made an exception. It should work in the future. The second question was “no” probably because the word itself isn’t in the plural form. The question “is there more than one of them in the world?” is functionally equivalent and works around this quirk.
I thought it was broken, because I asked if it was an oven, and it said yes… And then nothing. Just a bit confusing to people who don’t understand AI and fuzzy answers.
But sexist stereotypes did exist before the internet (at a much higher rate than today). Using the logic of the past doesn’t mean it’s being sexist of today.
Edit. Responded to the main post instead of a comment. Whoops
Similar but I thought it worked around it another way lol. I asked if it was smaller than a refrigerator (y) and larger than a toaster (y). I arrived at it being an appliance in the kitchen, so I thought it just said yes for the first one and it was a refrigerator. I was sad when it wasn’t lol
“Something went wrong” when I asked “Can I wear it”. Almost couldn’t continue until it finally went through. Would be good if you could change the question again if there’s an error
I like the concept but some of the answers can be really misleading.
Can be carried, is found in classrooms, not made of plastic, and inexpensive. None of that points towards a microwave for me. Microwaves CAN be carried I guess, but who has microwaves in classrooms? My microwave has plastic cowling on the front, and microwaves are like 70-100 bucks the last time I checked. Some of that is on me for the phrasing (does it contain plastic I guess should have been used, as an example) but it’s a bit odd.
It’s a really cool concept! Not much to improve regarding the UI. One small thing is, I found the thumbs up or down a bit less intuitive than seeing the answer spelled out
My second question was “Is it larger than a microwave” and it gave it to me. Sorta BS tbh. Idk if I’d have ever gotten it if it’d answered that question as “no” like it should’ve.
Edit: They updated it to make it more lenient. Imo too lenient.
quizzle.game
Gorące