originalfrozenbanana

@originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee

Profil ze zdalnego serwera może być niekompletny. Zobacz więcej na oryginalnej instancji.

originalfrozenbanana,

My internal rating is:

Overwhelmingly positive: game is actually quite good and also probably, but not always, a niche game.

Very positive: most people don’t hate it

Mostly positive: Game has one or two big, specific issues for most people, like a specific performance or gameplay problem, but is otherwise fun.

Mixed: game either sucks or has had some controversy. Usually games that are good but not worth the money go here.

Mostly negative: game sucks

Overwhelmingly negative: exclusively reserved for shovelware and yearly sports games like FIFA and NBA games.

originalfrozenbanana,

Not really. More of a city builder board game than RTS battler

originalfrozenbanana,

But…but software development absolutely does

originalfrozenbanana,

Full screen pop up ads, site is cancer

originalfrozenbanana,

Void crew is a version of this playable today. You can definitely play solo but nothing really comes close to how easy a game like SoT is to play solo

originalfrozenbanana,

Admittedly, most of the “Mostly Negative” Steam reviews seem to be reacting to the fact they exist at all, without considering whether they’re actually critical to your progress in the game or not (for clarity, they are not).

I didn’t know we were only allowed to write reviews based on things critical to your progress. I didn’t know how many companions you have or what your character looks like weren’t critical. I bet if we searched even a little we’d find a RockPaperShotgun review of “non critical” game features.

What horseshit.

originalfrozenbanana,

The thing is they made these features as part of the core gameplay then charged for them. It isn’t like you’re paying for a boost or game mode or special companion or something. You’re given the option to earn these features through playing a single player game or pay money and get them faster.

Literally carving out chunks of the base game and offering them up for money as if it is added value. The only value is saving time IN A SINGLE PLAYER GAME. If your single player game has elements that are so tedious or cumbersome that people will literally PAY MORE MONEY to get them on their terms you purposefully built a worse game than you could have.

originalfrozenbanana,

“They only cost rift crystals if they’re a higher level than you”

Ah yes this is additional value and content that you should pay money for, right? It’s not core gameplay to recruit companions regardless of their level like in almost every fucking game I’ve ever played right?

Imagine licking boot so hard that you actually believe this

originalfrozenbanana,

It’s ok that I can buy in game currency for my singer player game! It’s fine! It’s good actually! Recruiting high level companions, a THING THEY BUILT INTO THE BASE GAME DELIBERATELY THEN LET YOU PAY EXTRA FOR, using in game currency I can buy isn’t pay2win. Recruiting companions isn’t even core gameplay if they’re strong enough, bro.

It’s ok that Capcom sent reviewers a game without micro transactions that were in retail! That’s fine, it’s fine! The microtransactions were paying for now were expansions before so it’s uh…it’s better, yeah. I actually prefer my $70 USD single player games to have gameplay benefitting microtransactions.

You sound like you’ve swallowed the boot my guy. You’re so far gone you can’t see the way back. Glad you’re enjoying the game, though. Sounds like it was worth it to you.

originalfrozenbanana,

They are ticking a checkbox for the suits.

Yeah that’s like the whole problem, not a triviality. I’m sure DD2 is fun. Ive watched a lot of it streamed. Seems cool. I’m not gonna buy it because they did this shit, same reason I didn’t buy DMCV and haven’t bought a Capcom game in years. Stop rewarding scummy companies.

originalfrozenbanana,

I love how in your example “perfect” is not having moneygrubbing microtransactions and the “good” compromise we’re supposed to accept is the microtransactions the chose to put in for no purpose other than money

originalfrozenbanana,

Oh no I ate the onion

deleted_by_moderator

  • Loading...
  • originalfrozenbanana,

    This feels like a reference to that article that dropped yesterday making the same claims based on nothing but anecdotes, suppositions, and Twitter threads.

    The game is fun. If this is a scam then it’s doing far too much work trying to be a full game

    originalfrozenbanana,

    I think the article goes out of its way to describe how rare this is for a AAA game

    originalfrozenbanana,

    The number one reason for poor performance was outdated GPU drivers. The average game is a moron.

    originalfrozenbanana,

    Either missing a /s or a grip on reality

    originalfrozenbanana,

    No that’s literally the reason most cited. steamdb.info/patchnotes/12438768/

    Non-Updated Drivers. Lords of the Fallen is powered by UE5, a high-end technology that requires the latest GPU drivers. We’ve observed that the majority of crashes result from outdated drivers.

    originalfrozenbanana,

    This game was so fun on switch. A genuine joy to binge. Not sure it has any replay value for me but well worth the price just for one play through.

    originalfrozenbanana,

    In general very good, quite fun. No idea about steam deck.

    If you’re eager for an action rpg it is a good buy even without the dlc. If you’re curious I’d say it’s a sale buy.

    Note though that it REALLY needs a fast SSD or m.2 to run well. Don’t buy this if you’re using an HDD

  • Wszystkie
  • Subskrybowane
  • Moderowane
  • Ulubione
  • Spoleczenstwo
  • rowery
  • esport
  • Pozytywnie
  • krakow
  • giereczkowo
  • Blogi
  • tech
  • niusy
  • sport
  • lieratura
  • Cyfryzacja
  • kino
  • muzyka
  • LGBTQIAP
  • opowiadania
  • slask
  • Psychologia
  • motoryzacja
  • turystyka
  • MiddleEast
  • fediversum
  • zebynieucieklo
  • test1
  • Archiwum
  • FromSilesiaToPolesia
  • NomadOffgrid
  • m0biTech
  • Wszystkie magazyny