@avater@lemmy.world avatar

avater

@avater@lemmy.world

👻 Booooh…get fucked!

Profil ze zdalnego serwera może być niekompletny. Zobacz więcej na oryginalnej instancji.

avater, (edited )
@avater@lemmy.world avatar

for me the game runs pretty well with ~90+ fps on high and activated fsr2.

5800x 3D, 64 gigs of ram and a 6900XT I shot cheap during the great gpu collapse. And by the looks of the game this seems pretty reasonable to me.

avater,
@avater@lemmy.world avatar

Texture resolution has not considerably effected performance since the 90s.

lol. try to play a game with 4K textures in 4K on a NVIDIA graphics card with not enough vram and you see how it will affect your performance 😅

I wouldn’t say that Starfield is optimized as hell, but I think it runs reasonably and many people will fall flat on their asses in the next months because they will realize that their beloved “high end rig” is mostly dated as fuck.

To run games on newer engines (like UE5) with acceptable framerates and details you need a combination of modern components and not just a “beefy” gpu…

So yeah get used to low framerates if you still have components from like 4 years ago

Changing graphics settings in this game barely effects performance anyway.

That’s sound like you are cpu bound…

avater, (edited )
@avater@lemmy.world avatar

ohhhh so IT DOES affect performance at all 😱

avater, (edited )
@avater@lemmy.world avatar

people really need to put the nostalgia googles down…back in the days nobody played Crysis with full details and a steady framerate.

You were in 1024x768 and turned everything down just to play the game with barely 30fps and you know what, it was still dope as fuck. So yeah guys get used to lower your settings or to upgrade your rig and if you don’t want to do that get a xbox

avater,
@avater@lemmy.world avatar

I don’t know and I don’t care what is wrong with your system but the amd driver tells me I’m averaging at 87fps with high details on a 5800X and a radeon 6900, a system that is now two years old and I think this is just fine for 1440p.

So yeah the game is not unoptimized, sure could use a few patches and performance will get better (remember it’s a fucking bethesda game for christ’s sake…) but for many people the truth will be to upgrade their rig or play on xbox

avater, (edited )
@avater@lemmy.world avatar

sure mister gamedev, please continue to tell more on how an engine you clearly worked on, should run…

I dont say that Starfield is a well optimised game and performance will get better with upcoming patches. But I also don’t think it’s an unoptimized mess, I think it is running reasonable and people really should start review their rig, because modern games will need modern components

Oh and also other games did not run that well like you maybe remember ;)

avater,
@avater@lemmy.world avatar

why buying starfield when it is on gamepass 😅

And buddy, I’ve been playing Bethesda Games since Daggerfall and believe me, Starfield is a fucking polished diamond compared to their old good games and compared to their latest shitshows like fallout 4 and fallout 76…

avater, (edited )
@avater@lemmy.world avatar

does it look it look good compared to other AAA games? no

well I beg to differ on that, but it’s quiete a subjective topic right ;)

does it run fast? no ergo. the engine is crap.

Again very subjective, very dependend on your hardware and also a pretty dumb conclusion, since an engine has more qualities then to run “fast”.

I already mentioned in this thread, the games runs quite well for me and I would call fps in the range from 80 to 124 quite fast for a Bethesda Open World Game. So what do we do now with our subjective oppinions 🤔

avater,
@avater@lemmy.world avatar

that’s your opinion. A lot of people have a lot of fun with bethesda games…

avater,
@avater@lemmy.world avatar

haha!

just visited my parents and could negotiate with my little brother that the drives us home so we don’t have to take the train.

poor fellow thought starfield would also release on playstation 5 so I offered him my xbox series x as a reward for the drive 😅

avater,
@avater@lemmy.world avatar

ai rendering is the here to stay. Especially unreal 5 titles are relying heavy on fsr/diss

In its first week, Immortals of Aveum had a peak count of just 751 players on Steam. (steamdb.info) angielski

After 5 years in development and heavily pushing Unreal Engine 5 technologies, Immortals of Aveum was met with a whopping 751 player peak. For reference, Forspoken was considered a flop but still had over 12,000 players peak total. This may be the biggest flop of the year.

avater,
@avater@lemmy.world avatar

did you play the game? The world is pretty good and the dialoges and atmosphere quite similar to guardians of the galaxy.

This is a pretty good game and without any bloat. A simple 7/10 game but for me that’s enough

  • Wszystkie
  • Subskrybowane
  • Moderowane
  • Ulubione
  • Pozytywnie
  • krakow
  • giereczkowo
  • Blogi
  • rowery
  • tech
  • Spoleczenstwo
  • niusy
  • sport
  • lieratura
  • esport
  • Cyfryzacja
  • kino
  • muzyka
  • LGBTQIAP
  • opowiadania
  • slask
  • Psychologia
  • motoryzacja
  • turystyka
  • MiddleEast
  • fediversum
  • zebynieucieklo
  • test1
  • Archiwum
  • FromSilesiaToPolesia
  • NomadOffgrid
  • m0biTech
  • Wszystkie magazyny