That’s probably why it is pinned, to burry it away from everyone eyes 🙄.
I had multiples report about the various topics that popped over the weekend, because how many of them there was on a span of a few days. Moderating them was a nightmare, so I tried to politely ask everyone to consolidate on the same thread. Somehow it ended up in insults, so I had to close it. First I considered selecting another topic, but most of the remainding ones were to foccused on one part of the issue to do such thing.
Thus, the megathread.
Trust me, I’m not a fan of the concept either, mostly because how time costly it is to maintain it, but that the price to pay to not have to spend twice the time sorting repports on various threads.
Now, if you could give everyone the context so everyone can judge if your behaviour is childish or not
You posted a meme you made (which is now this topic thumbnail btw), with an exact copy of this very thread, which are both rule 4 violation
You reposted it as soon as I deleted it, adding an insult toward the moderation, without even trying to clarify with said moderation why the first one was removed. Rule 4 was once again called, as well as rule 2.
I sent you a direct message to try to explain you why it was removed, and direct you toward consolidating on this topic, that was, once again, posted not so long ago with the very same info (including the various linking errors) by no other than yourself. At least you seem to have registered the last part, as we can see here, but looks like there was no attention left for the first part.
So feel free to do your pool, which I find childish (but that’s my opinion). I’ll give you an hour or two to counterargue, and I’ll consider if I should or not give you a temp ban after that.
I played it on the Deck. I have to agree that there are rough edges (some ambient color go from A to B with no transition, and some zone have a really strange colorimetry compared to a more powerful device). But it is entirely playable.
GNU Taller is a good alternative, and I hope to use it in real life some day. Crypto, in their current form, is far too volatile and unregulated for me to be interested in.
They already wanted to do it, but didn’t want to take the blame for it. With a vocal minority now voicing concerns, they jumped on the occasion.
So why now rather than when that group started voicing their oppoaition ? Well, if they did earlier they had to deal with a liberal federal government that probably would have intervened in the name of free market, but now with a conservative fed government, they have free reign to impose regressive view on about anyone.
and using the full name of the diagnosis instead of contracted nouns helps avoid using slurs and/or dehumanising the patent.
You’ve got a typo there. Unless you can prove that said person was indeed diagnosed with such disability by an appropriate medical authority, let’s not use such term that could either be considered defamation, or at least medical disinformation. (/i)
People say what they intend to say, not what you wish them to. If you believe they are incorrect, no need to be pedantic about it. Just argue why, you’d find out people are way more open to arguments when they do not feel like you are condidering them as idiots.
Even if mostly useless, not doing anything is even more useless. At least that petition shows support for changes, which may influence some executive to rethink what they think is acceptable from their userbase.