Komentarze

Profil ze zdalnego serwera może być niekompletny. Zobacz więcej na oryginalnej instancji.

Jakeroxs, do games w Starfield Is Bethesda's Lowest-Rated Game On Steam

Considering all their past recent games had those aspects at least somewhat… It’s odd that they sterilized it so much in comparison.

Compare that to BG3 where there’s like… Full on sex and people can explode into a bloody mess

Jakeroxs, do games w Starfield Paid DLSS Mod Creator Hits Back at Pirates, Threatens to Add 'Hidden Mines' in Future Mods

It’s a day of work to implement the DRM, not the mod itself, which he did release day 1 for free on Nexus, only the frame gen version is behind the patreon wall, additionally he’s released many such DLSS+FG mods for various games (which all come with the sub) so he has a lot of experience implementing it and has clearly gotten it down pretty well.

Every game has its own challenges but Starfield was particularly easy (according to him) because of how FSR was implemented

Jakeroxs, (edited ) do games w Dusk: Unpopular opinion: I'd rather pay Valve 30% and put up with their de facto monopoly than help Epic work towards their own (very obviously desired) monopoly

I said in practice, not in law

Just pointing out I’m a different person lol

Jakeroxs, do games w Dusk: Unpopular opinion: I'd rather pay Valve 30% and put up with their de facto monopoly than help Epic work towards their own (very obviously desired) monopoly

Do you think it’s simple for a developer to create a friends list network, host/moderate community forums, host/moderate a mod website integrated into the game, achievements syncing, ability to share the game with friends, and integrate VR functionality for the above, on their own dime?

These are recurring ongoing costs for server and continued developmental changes, you are severely underestimating the time and money cost to create/host/maintain all those services?

Jakeroxs, do games w Dusk: Unpopular opinion: I'd rather pay Valve 30% and put up with their de facto monopoly than help Epic work towards their own (very obviously desired) monopoly

So you didn’t actually read my comment, cool.

Jakeroxs, do games w Dusk: Unpopular opinion: I'd rather pay Valve 30% and put up with their de facto monopoly than help Epic work towards their own (very obviously desired) monopoly

Weird because I provided actual services and functionality that steam provides in exchange for that cut, and your response was that me mentioning devs do have other options isn’t “understanding criticism”

So do you have an actual response or…?

Jakeroxs, do games w Dusk: Unpopular opinion: I'd rather pay Valve 30% and put up with their de facto monopoly than help Epic work towards their own (very obviously desired) monopoly

Generally companies do provide a service of some sort, the problem is that the higher ups who generally do less actual “work” rake in way way more then the average worker of the company.

Especially true for larger corps like Amazon

Jakeroxs, do games w Dusk: Unpopular opinion: I'd rather pay Valve 30% and put up with their de facto monopoly than help Epic work towards their own (very obviously desired) monopoly

Lol I see you don’t have an actual response so you move the goal post

Jakeroxs, do games w Dusk: Unpopular opinion: I'd rather pay Valve 30% and put up with their de facto monopoly than help Epic work towards their own (very obviously desired) monopoly

I just don’t think that’s the case with Valve, they work on steam and add new features consistently, it’s not like they’re providing no value for the cut they take.

I get where you’re coming from though and way too many companies get away with that kind of situation. Just what capitalism often gives us :/

Jakeroxs, do games w Dusk: Unpopular opinion: I'd rather pay Valve 30% and put up with their de facto monopoly than help Epic work towards their own (very obviously desired) monopoly

Who was replying to someone talking about Valve

Jakeroxs, do games w Dusk: Unpopular opinion: I'd rather pay Valve 30% and put up with their de facto monopoly than help Epic work towards their own (very obviously desired) monopoly

It literally is in practice.

Jakeroxs, do games w Dusk: Unpopular opinion: I'd rather pay Valve 30% and put up with their de facto monopoly than help Epic work towards their own (very obviously desired) monopoly

Do you think they wanted it to be abused? It’s pretty obvious they didn’t like the way it went which is why they got rid of it…

Jakeroxs, do games w Dusk: Unpopular opinion: I'd rather pay Valve 30% and put up with their de facto monopoly than help Epic work towards their own (very obviously desired) monopoly

What does that have to do with Valve?

Jakeroxs, do games w Dusk: Unpopular opinion: I'd rather pay Valve 30% and put up with their de facto monopoly than help Epic work towards their own (very obviously desired) monopoly

Then why isn’t GOG bigger?

Jakeroxs, do games w Dusk: Unpopular opinion: I'd rather pay Valve 30% and put up with their de facto monopoly than help Epic work towards their own (very obviously desired) monopoly

Then developers can release games off steam, and some do.

But steam has many features people want and use that would add development costs if every dev had to make similar tools in house.

Think SteamVR, Steam Controller, workshop, community forums, steam achievements, steam overlay, friends, etc …

  • Wszystkie
  • Subskrybowane
  • Moderowane
  • Ulubione
  • esport
  • rowery
  • test1
  • fediversum
  • FromSilesiaToPolesia
  • krakow
  • muzyka
  • healthcare
  • Gaming
  • Cyfryzacja
  • Blogi
  • NomadOffgrid
  • Technologia
  • ERP
  • shophiajons
  • informasi
  • retro
  • Travel
  • Spoleczenstwo
  • gurgaonproperty
  • Psychologia
  • slask
  • nauka
  • sport
  • niusy
  • antywykop
  • Radiant
  • warnersteve
  • Wszystkie magazyny