The paper doesn’t calculate the radius of the star’s Roche limit, instead opting to calculate the orbital period of the Roche limit. I’ve never done a Roche limit calculation for stars, but I have for planets/moons, and I’m not seeing anything that suggests it’s different than for planets. So, I think I did this correctly (excepting typos):
The star’s Roche limit is about 1.5 million km from its centre (~1 million km above its surface), and the planet’s orbit is about 2 million km from the star’s centre. Assuming a circular orbit, which should be the case at these distances, the orbit has a circumference of about 12.7 million km, and the planet is whipping around at a speed of about 2.3 million km/h, or 0.2% the speed of light.
fosstodon.org/ - this scientist reckons 0.2AU to Mars. Still 30m km. And thus about 100x further than the moon. But it only took Armstrong three days to do that distance!
Could we slingshot between the earth and the moon a probe to reach it’s relative solar velocity and chase it down? Does anyone know the bounds of that?
I still think they should build out a lunar crater radio telescope out there on the dark side of the moon. The radio silence and scale would be impossible to get any other way.
That’s an interesting thought I hadn’t considered. The Webb is about as quiet as we’re going to get anywhere near our orbit, but a lunar compound could very easily be much larger, and would be a great deal easier to service/upgrade.
Equipped with functioning instruments and still transmitting data, New Horizons will provide scientists valuable insight into the edge of our local solar system, helping us understand the transition zone between solar and interstellar environments.
astronomy
Gorące
Magazyn ze zdalnego serwera może być niekompletny. Zobacz więcej na oryginalnej instancji.