sciencealert.com

xilliah, do astronomy w NASA Selects a Wild Plan to "Swarm" Proxima Centauri With Thousands of Tiny Probes

The laser array is expensive but if it’s continuous and spread out enough you could keep sending newer probes. Or if it’s not continuous you could use it for different directions!

Starfighter,

According to Scott Manley’s video on the topic the probes would need to arrive at the correct time in order to form what is effectively a huge phased array antenna.

Only then is the combined transmission power of these tiny probes large enough to be received on earth.

happybadger, do astronomy w NASA Selects a Wild Plan to "Swarm" Proxima Centauri With Thousands of Tiny Probes
@happybadger@hexbear.net avatar

As Universe Today explored in a previous post, it would take between 19,000 and 81,000 years for a spacecraft to reach Proxima Centauri using conventional propulsion (or those that are feasible using current technology)

Jesus, at 4.25 light-years.

GlitchyDigiBun,
@GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Acceleration is a bitch. A manned flight would take longer as it would have to cap it’s thrust to 1-1.5G or risk long term effects. Not to mention having to cancel ALLL of that thrust starting at the halfway point.

happybadger,
@happybadger@hexbear.net avatar

Biology is frustrating. We’re built for everything except leaving the immediate area around the sea we crawled out of. Anything beyond that and our bones melt into cancer.

Flyberius,
@Flyberius@hexbear.net avatar

If you could maintain 1g of acceleration you would reach light speed in about a year.

Cuttlersan, do astronomy w The First US Moon Lander Since The Apollo Era Is About to Make History

Exciting! :D

Xariphon, do astronomy w A Bizarre State of Matter Exists Deep Inside Large Neutron Stars

Would it be a yes-or-no thing, or more of a continuum?

At stellar mass x there's Some quark soup but it's mostly ordinary neutronium, at 50x there's More, at 10,000x there's Pretty Much All Of It, etc?

Or is it a critical mass kind of thing where at stellar mass x there's No Soup For You and at x+3 it's a veritable soup buffet?

MartianSands,

The latter, I suspect. That’s certainly how forming a neutron star works in the first place, because if a star gets so dense that it can form neutronium then the neutronium (which is far more dense than the core was before) can easily keep making more.

It’s a similar story with black holes. Get past the threshold at which it forms, and the process runs away and swallows the whole star.

If a quark soup is more dense than neutronium, then it would be fairly all-or-nothing

kszeslaw, do wolnyinternet w Najstarsza strona internetowa miała właśnie 25 urodziny

Chyba 33… to artykuł z 2015

harcesz,
!deleted269 avatar
  • Wszystkie
  • Subskrybowane
  • Moderowane
  • Ulubione
  • Spoleczenstwo
  • rowery
  • esport
  • Pozytywnie
  • krakow
  • giereczkowo
  • Blogi
  • tech
  • niusy
  • sport
  • lieratura
  • Cyfryzacja
  • kino
  • muzyka
  • LGBTQIAP
  • opowiadania
  • slask
  • Psychologia
  • motoryzacja
  • turystyka
  • MiddleEast
  • fediversum
  • zebynieucieklo
  • test1
  • Archiwum
  • FromSilesiaToPolesia
  • NomadOffgrid
  • m0biTech
  • Wszystkie magazyny