godot, (edited )

Online sale have reduced distribution costs and unlimited scaling compared to physical media, so successful games are far more lucrative now than they were and unsuccessful games don’t have losses from overproduction and returns from stores.

Certainly a factor that should be included in determining what a game costs, as is the 30% off the top taken by Steam, Microsoft, and Sony for most digital sales. Distribution in 2023 was not a factor in determining the current max price for a standard edition non-sports game, which was set in the early 00s.

I’m also comfortable seeing games that cost less to produce carrying lower price tags, as in many cases they do, Hades and Hi-Fi Rush coming to mind.

If selling at the current rate wasn’t profitable, gaming companies would have stopped making games by now.

They continue to make $60 games, yes. No one can say whether some company would have made the greatest game of all time last year if they’d been able to sell it for $70, or $80 or $100. Maybe they’re making it now as GTA6.

  • Wszystkie
  • Subskrybowane
  • Moderowane
  • Ulubione
  • test1
  • giereczkowo
  • rowery
  • krakow
  • Spoleczenstwo
  • Psychologia
  • Blogi
  • muzyka
  • slask
  • nauka
  • sport
  • lieratura
  • antywykop
  • fediversum
  • motoryzacja
  • FromSilesiaToPolesia
  • Technologia
  • Cyfryzacja
  • tech
  • Pozytywnie
  • zebynieucieklo
  • niusy
  • esport
  • games@sh.itjust.works
  • kino
  • LGBTQIAP
  • opowiadania
  • turystyka
  • MiddleEast
  • Wszystkie magazyny