Komentarze

Profil ze zdalnego serwera może być niekompletny. Zobacz więcej na oryginalnej instancji.

Kecessa, (edited ) do games w Steam's new disclaimer reminds everyone that you don't actually own your games, GOG moves in for the killshot: Its offline installers 'cannot be taken away from you'

Should be cheaper, emphasis on should, but at the same time if they sell directly and take the same cut, that’s one less intermediary in the chain so more money going to the devs.

None of the managerial class are good people, wake up, all billionaires are taking advantage of us.

Kecessa, do games w Steam's new disclaimer reminds everyone that you don't actually own your games, GOG moves in for the killshot: Its offline installers 'cannot be taken away from you'

Their 30% cuts allowed Gabe to start collecting yachts, they could charge a lot less while still offering the same services and only Gabe would see his finances take the hit, no one else in the world would be poorer if they charged 20% instead.

Kecessa, (edited ) do games w Steam's new disclaimer reminds everyone that you don't actually own your games, GOG moves in for the killshot: Its offline installers 'cannot be taken away from you'

And they could do all of these good things while charging less than 30% and Gabe would be the only one feeling a negative impact on his finances.

As for contractors, they do hire them, court documents came out and their profits per actually employees are way higher than most companies, why? Contractors aren’t employees.

Kecessa, do games w Steam's new disclaimer reminds everyone that you don't actually own your games, GOG moves in for the killshot: Its offline installers 'cannot be taken away from you'

They indirectly are inflating it with their 30% cut

Kecessa, do games w Steam's new disclaimer reminds everyone that you don't actually own your games, GOG moves in for the killshot: Its offline installers 'cannot be taken away from you'

I mean, we are… Gabe became a billionaire that owns a yacht collection, his money came from somewhere, there’s no reason to defend any billionaires or their companies unless you are a billionaire yourself.

Kecessa, (edited ) do games w Steam Now Warns Consumers That They're Buying a License, Not a Game During a Purchase

A small minority of GOG games have DRM, a majority of Steam games have a form of DRM. “Use a simulator” isn’t a solution, I shouldn’t need a third party program to play the games I paid for.

Also there’s a pretty big difference between downloading the installer and backing up the installed files, one is an intended backup solution, the other is a workaround.

Kecessa, do games w Steam's new disclaimer reminds everyone that you don't actually own your games, GOG moves in for the killshot: Its offline installers 'cannot be taken away from you'

Preach brother!

Kecessa, do games w First Ever REBIRTH in NES Tetris

That’s how many levels with the color scheme where you pretty much can’t tell where the blocks are?

Kecessa, do games w Lenovo is working on Legion Go Gen 2 and Legion Go Lite handheld gaming PCs - Liliputing

I’ve realized I get some pretty bad cramps in my right hand if I play games that requires the track pad to replace a mouse, I wish the Deck’s side would be more angled (see Xbox controller)

Kecessa, do games w California’s new law forces digital stores to admit you’re just licensing content, not buying it

Eh… I was just showing that you don’t actually own your games as access to them can be taken from you, that’s all.

Kecessa, do games w Ubisoft comes crawlin' back to Steam

As to why I dont mind the fee as a consumer; valve invests its earnings into linux gaming and does cool shit like that.

You’re also talking like they wouldn’t have as many customers if they reduced their cut which is completely ridiculous. More profit would go to the people actually doing the work or prices would go down.

Stop defending the billionaire, you’re making a fool of yourself.

Kecessa, do games w Ubisoft comes crawlin' back to Steam

There’s a difference between dealing with it and defending it, you’re doing the latter by saying 30% is ok because reasons.

Kecessa, (edited ) do games w California’s new law forces digital stores to admit you’re just licensing content, not buying it

So they’re not DRM free then if you need Steam to download them. You also need to be connected to the internet at least once to confirm ownership, so even if you download it once and think that you can now just transfer the game from one PC to another without an internet connection or without Steam, you can’t.

DRM free and actual ownership means physical. The closest you’ll get to that with digital games is through GOG or Itch.io or anything similar where you can download the actual install files and you don’t need any launcher at all.

Kecessa, do games w California’s new law forces digital stores to admit you’re just licensing content, not buying it

They can still delete your account and cut you off from your games.

Kecessa, do games w Ubisoft comes crawlin' back to Steam

Again, they can afford their R&D while paying their employees more than the industry average and while making the owner a multibillionaire, they 100% could afford to lower their cut without any negative impact on everyone but Gabe Newell.

The lower % starts if a game sells enough copies to make 10m$, Valve has made 3m$ at that point.

Stop defending the people that make you poorer, they’re not your friends, all billionaires exist at the expense of our wealth. All. Of. Them. Are. Evil.

  • Wszystkie
  • Subskrybowane
  • Moderowane
  • Ulubione
  • Spoleczenstwo
  • nauka
  • tech
  • giereczkowo
  • muzyka
  • Blogi
  • lieratura
  • sport
  • rowery
  • FromSilesiaToPolesia
  • test1
  • informasi
  • slask
  • Psychologia
  • ERP
  • fediversum
  • motoryzacja
  • Technologia
  • esport
  • krakow
  • antywykop
  • Cyfryzacja
  • Pozytywnie
  • zebynieucieklo
  • niusy
  • kino
  • LGBTQIAP
  • warnersteve
  • Wszystkie magazyny